DiscEng
Member
Hi All,
Can this be done ? I looking at writing code for "stand alone" Micrologix500
(No other control purposes intended)
- Trying to track products from 4 lanes (count-up) which are constantly in use - totallising them - and then trickle feed the total (count down) as a single output.
Thinking of something like: -
Input 1 = Count-up 1: Input 2 = Count-up 2 : Input 3 = Count-up 3: etc
Then after Timer 1min lapse - Add all 4 counters & move to N#:## - also reset counters - Then counting resumes
(not concerned with minor count loss at this stage)
Thinking of Status file clock as pulse to enable N#:## count-down & therefore as single pulsed output
I obviously will have to contend with N#:## not being fully zero when next minute totals again.
Just wondered if I'm thinking alone the right lines - Welcome your thoughts
Thanks
Can this be done ? I looking at writing code for "stand alone" Micrologix500
(No other control purposes intended)
- Trying to track products from 4 lanes (count-up) which are constantly in use - totallising them - and then trickle feed the total (count down) as a single output.
Thinking of something like: -
Input 1 = Count-up 1: Input 2 = Count-up 2 : Input 3 = Count-up 3: etc
Then after Timer 1min lapse - Add all 4 counters & move to N#:## - also reset counters - Then counting resumes
(not concerned with minor count loss at this stage)
Thinking of Status file clock as pulse to enable N#:## count-down & therefore as single pulsed output
I obviously will have to contend with N#:## not being fully zero when next minute totals again.
Just wondered if I'm thinking alone the right lines - Welcome your thoughts
Thanks