Non-incendive barrier terminal

PhilRey

Member
Join Date
Apr 2002
Posts
57
This is not specifically a PLC question, but it deals with interfacing I/O.

Does anyone know who manufactures a non-incendive barrier terminal block (not an intrinsic safety barrier) for Class I, Div. 2 hazardous locations.
The searches that I have done only show Wieland Electric. That is fine but I would like to have more options.

In the past, I have used intrinsic safety barriers for "dry-contact" inputs (i.e. Pepperl & Fuchs, Stahl, MTL, ...) but it seems like going with a non-incendive barrier may be less expensive yet still appropriate for my application.

Another issue regarding I.S. vs. non-incendive barriers is the switching current at the dry-contact input device. I.S. barriers supply a much lower voltage/current which may impair the ability of the switch to close the circuit and transfer the signal reliably through the switch. Any opinions?

Thanks.

-Phil
 
Thanks for your reply.

I guess I should clarify exactly what I am looking for.

I am very familiar with explosion protection techniques and the application therof.

What I mean by I.S. barrier is a galvanic isolation or zener (with high-integrity ground) device that makes a NAMUR device or simple apparatus (like a dry contact) suitable for a Class I, Div. 1 hazardous location.

The non-incendive barrier terminal block (see Wieland Electric's non-incendive terminal ) is a non-isolating current limiting device that does not drop the signal level as low as an I.S. barrier so that it may be used with more standard I/O devices. It is also less expensive.

I am looking for an alternative manufacturer of such a device other than Wieland (not that anything is wrong with them) that is agency (FM, UL, CSA, etc.) certified for a Class I, Div. 2 hazardous location.

Thanks again.:)

-Phil
 
Forgive my ignorance, at first I was thinking of screen barriers

Phil, check out Pepperl+Fuch's
http://www.pefu.de/pa/interptop/barriers/main_e.html
That may not be explicitly what you are looking for but they may have.

Unitec
http://www.unitec.ca/isb.html

I know what you are refering to now but never paid attention or noticed the non-incendive term used before to apply to these devices. I work with printing presses that are built/designed with explosion proofing, solvent inks use to be the thing but now we use water base.
 
Phil,

I took up an effort about 2 years ago relating to your question. Manufacturers for nonincendive barriers are Wieland, Weidmuller, and Axiomatic. The problem with these is that they all use a high resistor (470 ohms) which makes it difficult to operate transmitters, I/P's and solenoid valves. I know Wieland has a nonincendive module (16 channels) with a 250 ohm resistor that will allow more current to drive I/O devices. This same module is FM approved nonincendive and rated Class I, Div. 2, with a T4 rating.

Good Luck!
 

Similar Topics

Do I need to put intrinsic barriers on instruments that are rated Class Div 2 and non-incendive? The mass flow controller tech support person...
Replies
9
Views
3,378
if we need to take back up of Siemens CPU(s7300 /s7400) with non siemens slave profibus nodes without their gsd files and when we restore it in...
Replies
0
Views
82
Hi all, I have installed a SICK AFM60A-S4IB018x12 encoder to Allen-Bradley CompactLogix PLC and configured its parameters via AOI provided by...
Replies
0
Views
95
Hi, I'm trying to understand a couple of things with a feedback signals that are used in a SRP/CS that I'm working with. Quick disclaimer: I'm...
Replies
2
Views
526
Hello, has anyone ever been caught in this situation? You have redundant CPUs, fieldbus is PROFINET, there are some devices which don't have the...
Replies
0
Views
514
Back
Top Bottom