"...mba in mktg & system.but i ve so much intrest on plc."
"Lions, and Tigers, and Bears! Oh My! This sounds like a witches-brew!"
(Paraphrasing Dorethy... or was it Dorathy... I think it was "Surrender Dorethy", but I can't remember exactly what the skywriting showed... it was kinda smudgy.)
Rabin... may I call you Rabin?
Elevmike gave you the place to start... however... this particular combination of interests that you have might produce a slight conflict of interests.
Would you be an MBA that happens to do PLC Programming... or a PLC Programmer that happens to understand the MBA point of view?
I think that the latter position is the better position to take.
Depending on your particular tastes and dedications, either field could be seen as being boring and/or laborious. They can both co-exist in one mind to a certain degree, however, which is the driver in your case?
Would you be primarily a "bean-counter" or a "process-developer"?
OEM's would love you to be a "bean-counter"... in a short-sighted way, while paying lip-service to the long-sighted way. (Ooooo... I think I might have brushed some feathers the wrong way... but then, that's what I always do.)
End-Users would love you to be a "real-process-developer"... in a long-sighted way, without regard to how many beans were spent to produce a long-term, reliable process. Because they, the end-users, realize that consistent reliability provides the best day-to-day and long-term production results. It makes them look good, and it makes the company look good.
This is true, even more so, if the production folks don't have to spend their time running around handling crisis after crisis, or calling maintenance to figure out what's going wrong.
Granted, there is a SIGNIFICANT difference between the two points of view. And each of those views has their valid points. However, the bottom line is to maximize production without over-burdening the producers so that they can continue to maintain that maximized production.
How much burden does mid/upper-management really have? Golf at 2:00? Camel Racing at 3:00?
Yeah, OK, those were just a couple of cheap-shots. But, the question still remains. What does mid/upper-management do to increase production without over-burdening the producers... in this day and age of cut-back, after cut-back? Cut-backs happen on the producers... not mid/upper-management, at least, not nearly as much so as it does on the producers.
For those that would object to those characterizations...
...Later... if there are any specific objections.
So... what say you, Rabin?
Just curious.