View Full Version : Test
CaseyK
July 4th, 2005, 12:06 AM
Had this been an actual post.....
Eric Nelson
July 4th, 2005, 12:11 AM
CaseyK AKA kc9ih?... :scratch:
It must be, 'cause there ain't enough room for 2 Caseys in North Central Illinois... ;)
:beerchug:
-Eric
dandrade
July 4th, 2005, 06:46 PM
Basicamente recomendações advém ao fato de despreparo ou falta de atenção e informação suficiente no manual.
Observation unique scan
Start A=Trasition to ON
PRG 01
-----||----+----|\|-----( )
A | C B
-----||----+
B
-----||---------[SET C ]
A
RESULT B=ON
PRG 02
-----||------------[SET B]
A
-----||------------[RST B]
A
RESULT B=OFF
Filosofia
Geral: A instrução SET/RESET or segundo nome LATCH/UNLATCH
Primeiro nome significa colocar para cima,levantar e colocar para baixo,derrubar
Segundo nome significa: Manter permantente LIGADO ou permanente DESLIGADO.
Deste dois significados, define seu emprego.
Qual finalidade e motivo?
R: Para situações onde durante o processamento não é possível fixar o estado final da variavél.
Isto significa, que o status OFF/ON não pode ser determinado enquanto não finalizar o processamento (sic. subroutines) ou encontrar o FIM.
Emprego e utilização: [1]
STATUS adquirido em processamento
Memória fixa - Significando para humano, desocupar da necessidade de verificar seu STATUS.
PLC brands e variações de configurações desta instrução:
Habilitação de faixa de registros retentivos; Operação não diferenciada para PRG01 PRG02 (ladders in top)
Habilitação de faixa de registros retentivos; Operação retentiva somente quando utiliza PRG 02
Habilitação de retentivos permanentes (Frequentemente lock in firware); O registro "tornara retentivos" quando utilizar a instrução de PRG 02
Agora dizer que cada pessoa utiliza a instrução de modo que convém, pode ser considerado para organização...
Mas se não alinha a conceito definido em [1] estará mal utilizado.
Status adquirido em processamento: Pode ser observado em
Várias condições (partes do programa)que podem alterar o STATUS (sic.alarms, acks, events human)
Reciprocamente um BIT que guia o processamento e pode modificar durante o processamento subsequente.
Pierre, certeza que seu relato de programa está englobado na finalidade e motivo justificado.
Terry, conceito de colar dedo no interruptor está antigo e juvenil.Além de que quando não empolga a leitura é concisa
Darrenj, understand you example.
dandrade
July 5th, 2005, 08:33 AM
Basically recommendations ghosts (does not know the author or does not know is been real) and generic are created due to the not read people or absence of attention the variations of configurations [3] or is lacking of information detailed and complete in the manual
Observation unique scan
Start A=Transition to ON
PRG 01
--------||-----+-----|\|---------( )
A | C B
--------||-----+
B
--------||------------------[SET C]
A
RESULT B=ON
PRG 02
--------||----------[SET B]
A
--------||----------[RST B]
A
RESULT B=OFF
Philosophy
Generality: Instruction SET/RESET or LATCH/UNLATCH
First name means: Put to top/down.
Segund name means: To keep permanent ON or permanent OFF.
Of this two meanings, define it aplication.
Which purpose and reason? [2]
R: For situations where during the processing it is not possible to fix the finale state of variable.
This means, that status OFF/ON cannot be determined while not to finish the processing (sic. subroutines) or to find the END.
Application and use: [1]
STATUS acquired in processing
Fixed memory - Meaning for human being, to vacate of the necessity to verify its STATUS.
PLC brands and variations of configurations of this instruction:[3]
Configuration of range of retentive registers; Operation not differentiated for PRG01 PRG02 (ladders in top)
Configuration of range of retentives registers; Retentive operation only when it uses PRG 02
Configuration of permanent retentives (Frequent Lock in firware); The register "becomes retentives" when to use the instruction of PRG 02
Now to say that each person uses the way instruction that to can be considered for organization...
But if does not line up the concept defined in [1] badly will be used.
Status acquired in processing: It can be observed in
Some conditions (parts of program) can modify the STATUS (sic.alarms, acks, events human)
BIT [register] that guides the processing and can modify during the processing subsequent.
Pierre , certainty that you program is included in the purpose and justified reason.[2]
Terry , concept of glue finger in the switch is old and harmless.
Darrenj, understand you example.
Terry Woods
July 6th, 2005, 07:20 PM
"Terry , concept of glue finger in the switch is old and harmless."
I give up dandrade...
akreel
July 6th, 2005, 09:07 PM
"Terry , concept of glue finger in the switch is old and harmless."
I give up dandrade...I think it's referring to jamming (glue = stick) a knife (finger) or some other "tool" into an alarm reset pushbutton. I'm not sure what "harmless" was supposed to be translated to, though.
I know Portugese is a tough language. Isn't there a better translator out there?
AK
CaseyK
July 7th, 2005, 09:51 PM
Perhaps we need to get Kermit to translate through Miss Piggie, via "Miss Piggie Latin".
.....casey
paraffin power
July 14th, 2005, 03:41 AM
"Terry , concept of glue finger in the switch is old and harmless."
I give up dandrade...
Terry - you don't understand that? What's wrong with you? :lolis:
Pp
Terry Woods
July 14th, 2005, 02:18 PM
No, pp...
I don't understand.
I tend to think in logical reality, so, no... I don't understand.
I do not understand what dandrade was saying...
...between concept and statement, or statement and concept, I see a discongruity.
Discongruities lead, logically, to non-understanding.
It's the damned ambiguity issue... don' cha know?
CaseyK
July 14th, 2005, 06:23 PM
Ai-yi-yi-yi-yi!
Unregistered
July 20th, 2005, 10:27 AM
What is he waffling on about , is he related to Stanley Unwin ?
Unregistered #2
July 20th, 2005, 10:47 AM
Who is Stanley Unwin?
paraffin power
July 20th, 2005, 10:50 AM
He's a genius!
http://www.stanleyunwin.com/
Pp
MartB
July 20th, 2005, 11:51 PM
just trying out my new avatar and signature.
darrenj
July 28th, 2005, 09:19 PM
Darrenj, understand you example.[/QUOTE]
Now this HAS to be taken out of context!! I have no idea what was being said!!!
STEVEBOT
July 31st, 2005, 05:22 AM
He's a genius!
http://www.stanleyunwin.com/
Pp
Small minor point Poor Stan is now a past tense..
.