EthernetIP Network

abwiz

Member
Join Date
Nov 2005
Location
PA
Posts
196
I was hoping to get some feedback on my EthernetIP network that I am planning. I really shouldn't say planning because pretty much everything has been ordered. I am hoping that I didn't miss anything real critical that would render this application useless.

As you can see from my diagram, I have 4 remote nodes that will be communicating with a Logix5561 processor. My intention was to isolate the IO/CONTROL network from the DATA network. My solution was to use 2 different ENBT cards. One module is designed to communicate with all FlexIO modules and the other would be used for HMI applications and connection to the PLC for data logging and software changes (upload/download). You can see from the different colors how the networks will be divided.

I have read through most of the EthernetIP doucments and application notes from RA and have read some good posts on this forum about using EthernetIP and I am aware of some of the problems that can occur. I would like to avoid them up front and make this IO network robust and worry free.

My question is whether it is necceassary to assign these 2 isolated networks as different subnets or can I just use the VLAN feature of a switch to accomplish the same thing. Or maybe I just would want 2 different switches. Not sure really. I DON'T want the IO traffic be bothered by anything else. What is the best way to accomplish this or is all this really neccessary.

The DATA network will most likely have other nodes such as cameras and various PC stations. The traffic on this network is really not of much concern because nothing is really time critical.

I would appreciate any feedback, suggestions, comments or bashings (if I deserve them).

enetip_layout.GIF
 
I wouldn't run everything through the one switch. Since you will have two ENBTs anyway, just keep all the I/O and the I/O ENBT on one switch and put everything else on the other. If you do this you won't need a fancy managed switch as all the multicast stuff will be contained on a separate hardware group. You can still bridge through the ENBTs and the backplane if you want to do some direct diagnostic stuff on your I/O.

Given your I/O mix I could make the case that a single ENBT and a managed switch could work too.

Keith
 

Similar Topics

Hi There. I have PC to get few tags from PLC into C# windows forms application. What is the best and fastest way? I could not find Omron in...
Replies
3
Views
245
Hi, I am experimenting with different devices & am battling the connection sizes. At present, have a 1734-AENT/C, 1xOB8 & 1xIB8 I have tried...
Replies
13
Views
1,106
Hello All, I'm sorry that this will have been asked a thousand times, but I cannot find the specific question to search for. I am looking for...
Replies
6
Views
828
Hello, I am looking for some information on converting a Flex IO (1794-ADN) which is device net to an Ethernet/Ip Flex IO module like an AENT...
Replies
1
Views
425
So I have been wondering, the copy of the ethernet/ip molex tool I have (2.3.0 build 3) was from the molex website and only has a few tabs: List...
Replies
12
Views
1,342
Back
Top Bottom