A question about EtherCat

mikas_m

Member
Join Date
Feb 2007
Location
ck
Posts
154
Hello to all,
I wonder how many of you have used EtherCat. I have heard for EtherCat recently and if I understood correctly it is Ethernet based system which incorporates fieldbus. I don't know if it is meant to replace industrial Etrhernet and would like to read your opinions. I have read that EtherCat is optimized for high speed transfers of data. I would like to know more about comparing industrial Ethernet and EtherCat. If someone has more informations, please share with us.
Thank you very much
 
I've never used ethercat but one thing I know about ethercat is that multiple devices can receive the same packet of information, same IP address. Typically a fieldbus device only produces or consumes from one to just a few words of information. This wastes a huge amount of bandwidth because a complete data packet full of unused words is still transmitted. Ethercat packs the packet full of information for lots of devices, effecitvely increasing the bandwith by an order of magnitude.
 
I believe Ethercat holds the blue ribbon of being the fastest fieldbus out there at the moment. But new Ethernet based industrial fieldbusses are popping up at an alarming rate. Anyone ever heard of "VARAN" ?
On www.sps-forum.de there are several people that rave about EtherCat. If you know german I recommend you to go there and search for "Ethercat".
 
We are in the early stages of upgrading our press control system, removing Interbus and replaceing it with EtherCAT. No experience yet. This is an oem job. They spec'd EtherCAT as their choice for upgrade. I'm also curious to hear from any others who have experiences to share.

Search the forum for "Ethercat", you see a few previous discussions includeing mine, asking the same question...

http://www.plctalk.net/qanda/showthread.php?t=26144
 
Last edited:
Yet another Ethernet Protocol.

JesperMP said:
I believe Ethercat holds the blue ribbon of being the fastest fieldbus out there at the moment. But new Ethernet based industrial fieldbusses are popping up at an alarming rate.
There are too many. Every one thinks they can do it better than the next guy.

Anyone ever heard of "VARAN" ?
Yes, and many others. The market is too fragmented.

On www.sps-forum.de there are several people that rave about EtherCat. If you know german I recommend you to go there and search for "Ethercat".
You don't need to speak German but it helps when the babelfish translator gives up because the grammar and spelling is poor. Every once in a while I lurk.
They BS on that forum more than the people do on this one.
 
Hmm, so it's only ethernet based but still fieldbus communication system. So real comparision should be between ethercat and profibus then, not between industrial ethernet and ethercat.
I wonder, since it is pretty much new technology, how much one must wait to see if choosing EtherCat really pays off?
 

Similar Topics

Hey everyone, I have a customer that has an existing machine that needs more IO added to it. Right now the setup is as follows. CPU - NX1P2...
Replies
10
Views
1,228
Hello again..trying something on an existing poorly written program and just wanted to double check something system is an A-B MicroLogix 1200 In...
Replies
5
Views
163
Good morning! Let me start by saying, I am still learning about this type of HMI programming. I recently watched a video about recipes and how it...
Replies
0
Views
66
I have some logic that I have written within a 5380 series controller that tracks the time an event is started, while the event is running an RTO...
Replies
2
Views
89
I have an HMI 2711R - T4T Series B, and I want to know which PLCs, besides Micro 820, can communicate with it.
Replies
2
Views
80
Back
Top Bottom