SMOKE
Member
Peter I see that there is a class in January for the 70 series RMC. I class says its custom or something like that. Can explain the difference between that one and others.
They are for hydraulic cylinder position control. He is doing something for a jog mode I would like to know if there is a better way. Works ok but if you dont have the count and speed just right the cylinders are jerky.
There are acceleration and deceleration parameters in the commands that will allow you make the motion smoother if you reduce them. You may need to reduce the speed too. The trick is to use the same command for all 5 axes and you may need to use closed loop moves to do the jogs to keep all the axes aligned. This is easy to do in the step table.SMOKE said:Thanks for the reply. While I am posting about the RMC's, Ill ask another question if anyone would answer. We have several of the RMC 100's. They were installed and setup by another programmer before I came here. They are for hydraulic cylinder position control. He is doing something for a jog mode I would like to know if there is a better way. Works ok but if you dont have the count and speed just right the cylinders are jerky. There are 5 cylinders linked together.
I just got a RMC 75E that I am going to control servos XY. These seem like great little devices. I wish I knew about then at my previous job.
There are acceleration and deceleration parameters in the commands that will allow you make the motion smoother if you reduce them. You may need to reduce the speed too. The trick is to use the same command for all 5 axes and you may need to use closed loop moves to do the jogs to keep all the axes aligned. This is easy to do in the step table.SMOKE said:Thanks for the reply. While I am posting about the RMC's, Ill ask another question if anyone would answer. We have several of the RMC 100's. They were installed and setup by another programmer before I came here. They are for hydraulic cylinder position control. He is doing something for a jog mode I would like to know if there is a better way. Works ok but if you dont have the count and speed just right the cylinders are jerky. There are 5 cylinders linked together.
I just got a RMC 75E that I am going to control servos XY. These seem like great little devices. I wish I knew about then at my previous job.
Jacob does much of the RMC75 support and support. He has an example program that shows different ways to do XY type of moves. One can do constant time moves or constant feed rate or speed moves. It is easy. One step is all that is need to index through array of x,y positions and make the desired x,y move from point to point.
The 150 is a new product. No one I know has used it for a robotic application with a arm, fore arm, write etc,........ yet.CharlesM said:Thanks Peter that is very cool. Have you done any kinamatics in the 150 yet? With all the math power in the RMC I bet you could.
Jacob does much of the RMC75 support and support. He has an example program, that we can send you, that shows different ways to do XY type of moves. One can do constant time moves or constant feed rate or speed moves. It is easy. One step is all that is need to index through array of x,y positions and make the desired x,y move from point to point.
I looked now understanding is another thing. I can tell what is going on becuase I see the event program going along with it.Did you really look at the word codes and understand them? WOW!
One location for the xy (I guess I should be saying yz) will come from a DVT camera the next location will be fixed in 1 of 2 places depending if the part needs to be flipped or not. The camera makes that determination.
That is a good idea. Looking at the DVT web site they show ethernet I/O for inputs/outputs to the camera. My local distributor has a DVT event coming up. I don't know if its just local guys or if DVT will be there. I'll ask about it either way. It should be real fast going between the to.I would really like to know how the DVT interface works out. Our module is Ethernet/IP certified so it should be easy if the DVT can send data as I/O.
No PLC would be required between the DVT and RMC.