However -- I have seen systems that were Green = safe (system OFF), Red = danger (system running) But this just seems backwards from every other color coding used in anyplace and tends to confuse people. Hopefully, you're not considering this...
Ozee,
Please do not blame the Green/Off Red/On on backwards people. It was a NEMA (National Electrical Manufacturer's Association) standard for many, many years, and also a JIC (Joint Industrial Council) standard. If you were building electrical equipment to meet NEMA standards, you HAD to use that color code. Period. If you didn't care if you met NEMA standards, then you were free to use whatever you wanted.
When NEMA first introduced it, it made perfect sense to everyone. If you are walking across the street (most people did walk a lot back in those good old days), Red = Danger, but go. Green = Don't go, stay safe.
Over the years, perceptions here gradually changed, as America's facination with the automobile grew and grew. Walking/Not walking is no longer the first thing that the average American person thinks of when they see red and green lights. It seems that everyone in the U.S. now thinks of himself as being in the driver's seat AT ALL TIMES.
Does that say something about our inflated egos? Perhaps it says more about our lack of passenger transportation systems and the amount of time we spend in cars waiting at red lights.
One time I remember meeting the truck from the motor control center factory and climbing up and swapping all the red and green lens, before our customer got a chance to complain. The customer's written specifications had stated that the motor control center "must meet all NEMA standards", but it turned out that is not what he wanted. What he meant was that it should "meet all NEMA standards (except the ones I don't like)."
NEMA finally deleted that code, after much confusion. Now we have no NEMA color code standard (that I know about) for process functions.