Ghost Logic and Tags

arkansascontrols

Lifetime Supporting Member
Join Date
Jan 2008
Location
Arkansas
Posts
112
I have an S7 application that was acting strangley.

I had a symbol at some memory address M9.5 that was used previously but eventually freed up, and cleared from the symbol table. Later I had an occasion to need a new permissive and got the next available M address which happened to be M9.5. The new logic that set the bit was working properly and the bit was high as it should have been, but a subsequent rung that contained an XIC (Normally Open Contact for you non AB users) although it showed true the logic that followed would not execute.

Once I changed the address of the bit to M9.6 the rung that used the bit as a permissive began working. I discovered this by branching around the bit with an ALWAYS TRUE input. Even though it was true the logic would not execute, but with the always true in parallel, the rung would execute.

I've also noticed that if you delete an FC and then later create a new FC using the original FC Number when you download it to the PLC you get a warning that it exists.

Is there a way to 'clean up' the memory so to speak to truly rid it of all previously deleted routines and tags?


Eric
 

Similar Topics

Guys I know this may not be a PLC question but I do have a issue that I was needing some advise. I was needing to know the best way to create a...
Replies
6
Views
1,939
I need to ghost this machine. ALLEN BRADLEY 1500P Cat 6181P-15A2MW71AC MAT N0 PN 337626 DIR: 10002125617/00 20FEB2017 Windows 7 Professional I...
Replies
1
Views
1,353
Can't take credit for this, a friend had seen it. But Rockwell, etc. were all lost. Relay output card. Large rack. LOTS of outputs. Output...
Replies
1
Views
1,462
Hi everyone, had an odd occurence happen and wondering if its ever happened to anyone else in their field. Programming a GE RX3I with...
Replies
7
Views
1,852
While creating a runtime, the progress window shows: compression Tag\ABC1_ABC.db.wat The ABC1_ABC is a project\target\tag\???? from a previous...
Replies
1
Views
1,537
Back
Top Bottom