Wireless Ethernet in industry

MrQ

Member
Join Date
Feb 2005
Posts
236
Hello,

What are your experiences in using Wireless Ethernet in the industry?

I am looking at a system where I have one cabinet with a PLC + a display that both communicates via Eth. Then there is one moving unit with two VFDs and remote I/O that can communicate via Ethernet.

The distance will me max 150 meters and clear sight.

Has anyone used the Rugged Wireless LAN Ethernet Port Adapter - RWEPA from Connect blue?
http://www.connectblue.se/products/...-housings/rugged-ethernet-port-adapter-rwepa/

It looks good at least on the paper...
 
Hello,

What are your experiences in using Wireless Ethernet in the industry?

I am looking at a system where I have one cabinet with a PLC + a display that both communicates via Eth. Then there is one moving unit with two VFDs and remote I/O that can communicate via Ethernet.

The distance will me max 150 meters and clear sight.

Has anyone used the Rugged Wireless LAN Ethernet Port Adapter - RWEPA from Connect blue?
http://www.connectblue.se/products/...-housings/rugged-ethernet-port-adapter-rwepa/

It looks good at least on the paper...

I would be hesitant at using Wireless Ethernet to do any control over the RI/O, as long as it is monitoring only it would be ok.

I use wireless quite a lot for HMI and inter PLC comms and it is pretty good. Just make sure you are really careful if you use any mesh features as it can really screw your network up if you dont know what you are doing (and sometime even when you do if you have a complex network)
 
I would be hesitant at using Wireless Ethernet to do any control over the RI/O, as long as it is monitoring only it would be ok.
quote]


How come? Due to interference problems or other reasons? If I loose connection to the RIO they will loose signal and this is the safe state for the system. I will get a signal in the PLC and can turn of the automatic state of the system.

Of course if there is some reason that I believe I will loose connection all the time it is no good.
 
I think that most ethernet-wise people would shy away from using it for control...especially wireless. You already called out a few of the reasons

1) Interference - you don't want electrical noise getting into your packets and starting/stopping machinery

2) Deleted =)

3) Latency - std Ethernet is not 'deterministic' meaning, that data is not communicated on any kind of schedule. Google CSMA/CD for a better explanation that says "sometimes, your data might sit and wait to be transmitted, and sometimes it wont.

4) security - all computer systems/security methods are hackable. having a wireless node greatly expands the amount of real estate that would need to be guarded/protected to enact any kind of physical security vs. intrusion. The security/operations ramifications of this are very far reaching in my world (power production)

The reasons above are enough for me to never control over wireless ethernet, and make me very hesitant to even monitor things wirelessly.

-John
 
For a system that is controlled via wireless ethernet, I would go for Profinet, and wifi equipment that is certified for Profinet. I know of some projects that use these with success. I would not "invent a system on my own". Siemens has a complete suite of products for this, but count on that they are "not cheap". You get what you pay for.

I know there are 3rd party suppliers of wifi for Ethernet/IP. Not sure if Rockwell has their own line of equipment.
 
Hi,

Try RadioLinx Frequency Hopping (RLX-FH) radios from “Prosoft Technology”. We have this in our plant for five years for our giant overhead cranes by NKM NOELL and it’s been working trouble free. If you are interested check their website www.prosoft-technology.com

Don
 
I use quite a bit of Ethernet both over wireless and wired networks Siemens and AB. But generally I would not recommend for Remote IO - only for monitoring and basic control (HMI, Scada interface etc). Well, it all depends on the process. I prefer a local PLC at the process that is programmed with correct default action in the event of comms loss. I would only use Wireless Ethernet in Remote IO for applications with no safety or process risks. No matter what who says, wireless is never trouble-free. You might get it close to 100% reliable but "close" is always the operative word...
 
I concur on remote I/O especially critical I/O points monitoring is one thing but I've encountered too many problems with wireless regardless of how much is spent on it to rely on wireless for critical I/O. Your better off with something like devicenet or profibus
 

Similar Topics

Hello Y'all, I was wondering if there is any standalone solution to replace the ethernet cable to connect to a PLC? like perhaps a "Dongle"...
Replies
26
Views
2,343
What's everyone using for their wireless ethernet radios? Just for a couple remote 1794flex racks a couple city blocks away. We've used Esteem in...
Replies
3
Views
895
Hi, I have a controllogix PLC cabinet with unmanaged Ethernet switch. I can go online by connecting to the switch via the laptop wired connection...
Replies
11
Views
3,003
I have an existing system using a Phoenix Contact WLAN 4321 long-range point-to-point Ethernet extender which works pretty well for our purposes...
Replies
7
Views
2,657
Good Morning , I'm going to be using a Compactlogix L33 , to capture some data and would like to use Wireless Ethernet to accomplish this...
Replies
0
Views
1,133
Back
Top Bottom