Problem with a 1769-OF8C, CompactLogix

Elcan

Lifetime Supporting Member
Join Date
Apr 2008
Location
NC
Posts
935
Hi all,
I'm experiencing this weird situation. I have a 1769-OF8C Analog Outputs card, used with a CompactLogix, and RSLogix 5000. I set this card to send a 4-20 mA signal.
The problem is that I'm getting 12 mA all the time at the outputs, no matter the values I try to send.
Any idea about what I'm doing wrong?

Thank you!
 
What's the output data echo (Input word 3-10) says? Have you wrote configuration data over yet? Are you seeing any faults?

More details, please.
 
I have the same issue, how i can solve that. I has been tested the channel 0 with 500 ohms resistance but dont works. Always 12mA.
Somebody help me with configuration parameters. Thanx
 
Somewhat WAG here, but if you open up the properties box on the analog module, and go to limits, do you have the limits set to appropriate values?


The first time I installed an Analog Output module in a ControlLogix system, I was surprised to find that the upper and lower limits both defaulted to zero. I would have expected 0 to 100% as the default configuration settings. Nope.
 
You're right about the clamp values. Andre opened another new thread and we found that the "stuck at 12 mA" symptom lines up with "Raw/Proportional range and default 0/1 min/max values".

It's a common-enough issue that it's described in the RA Knowledgebase (TechConnect Required)

https://rockwellautomation.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/46010


To be honest, I'd rather not even have this configuration option. I can set clamps in my program logic. This strikes me as a solution desperately searching for a non-existent problem.
 
Maybe problem is solved.
I was going through same problem. I changed Data format setting to "Scaled for PID" and set limits to "0..16383".

It solved and I got 4..20mA at outputs.

Regards,
Shailesh
 
The infamous Limits tab on the configuration dialog....

I always make a point of that when teaching analog output configuration...

Changing the onboard scaling from default values does not change the limit (clamp) values.

But once you know, or have been trained to know, it's easy.

I disagree with Bit_Bucket_07 - configuration is the best place for this, as it a physical constraint opposed to a programmed constraint. What if a maintenance tech forced the output to 100%, the output mudule limit would still apply, which is as it should be.
 

Similar Topics

I'm trying to get an upload from a machine for backup purposes. The upload seems to work fine but at the end I get errors and no upload. It...
Replies
2
Views
1,387
Hi All~ I have a case (designed by my boss But he has left the company) Please refer to the attached picture...
Replies
6
Views
2,376
Dear All members I have problem about CPU CompactLogix 1769-L31 as follows; Step 1. I connect this CPU 1769-L31 with 1769-PA2 and 1769-ECR...
Replies
3
Views
1,492
Hi Gents: I met a problem with one of my 1769-OB32 module. Some of the channels suddenly malfunction -- The light indications for the channel are...
Replies
1
Views
1,541
This is my first post so I am new to this website. Well to start with I have set card dipswitch to external power supply. I am feeding 24vdc to...
Replies
28
Views
6,950
Back
Top Bottom