is it important to use WINCC/SERVER V7.0 or not ?

ehassab

Member
Join Date
Mar 2010
Location
portsaid
Posts
2
Dear all,
if i want to connect two Wincc workstations with redundancy option (in case if any work statin failures, the other does all taskes) its must to use WINCC/SERVER? because one supplier suggest that the following configration and told me it must use to have full redundancy option in case of failure , and other supplier cancel WINCC/SERVER from configuration becuse it can work well without it
So what can i do ,please i need help from WinCC genius
Order No.DesignationQuantity6AV6371-1CF07-0AX0WINCC/REDUNDANCY V7.0, OPTION FOR SIMATIC WINCC V7.0, RUNTIME SOFTWARE, SINGLE LIC. F. 2 INSTALLATIONS16AV6381-2BN07-0AX0WINCC SYSTEMSOFTWARE V7.0 SP1, RC 512 (512 POWER TAGS), RUNTIME & CONFIGURATION, ON DVD, FLOATING LICENSE, 5 LANGUAGES (GER,EN,IT,FR,SP), EXEC. UNDER XPPROF/VISTA26AV6371-1CA07-0AX0WINCC/SERVER V7.0, OPTION FOR SIMATIC WINCC V7.0, RUNTIME SOFTWARE, SINGLE LICENSE26GK1161-3AA01COMMUNICATION PROCESSOR CP 1613 A2 PCI CARD (32BIT;33MHZ/66MHZ; 3.3V/5V UNIVERSAL KEY) FOR CONNECTION TO IND. ETHERNET (10/100MBIT/S) WITH ITP AND RJ 45 PORT VIA S7-1613 AND S7-REDCONNECT. SUPPORT FOR OPERATING SYSTEM SEE SIMATIC NET SW26GK1716-0HB71-3AA0SIMATIC NET, S7-REDCONNECT/2008 INCL. S7-OPC-SRVR, S7-1613/2008 ,SW FOR FAIL SAVE S7-COMM.; SINGLE LICENSE F.1 INSTALLATION R-SW, SW + ELECTR. MAN. ON CD LICENSE KEY ON USB-STICK, CLASS A 2-LANGUAGES (G,E); FOR 32BIT:WIN XP PROFESSIONAL, WIN VISTA ULTIMATE/BUSINESS, WIN 2003/2008 SERVER, FOR CP1613,CP 1613 A2, CP 16232
 

Similar Topics

FYI. From this website https://www.hms-networks.com/cybersecurity there is this onformation regarding ecatcher.
Replies
5
Views
3,315
Good Morning , I had a short meeting with our human resource manager yesterday and realized that the maintenance technician ad's were...
Replies
3
Views
1,524
Hello All, I wanted to get the opinions of some of the people here. So here is my question. What kind of automation, that if implemented in a...
Replies
9
Views
3,832
Now this is what I call a tank overflow! The Taum Sauk upper reservoir failure of 2005: http://web.mst.edu/~rogersda/dams/2_43_Rogers.pdf
Replies
5
Views
3,006
Well I may just be old but my son turned me on to this one. One of the boogers (or so I thought) about CoDeSys PLCs (Wago, Beckhoff, ABB, etc...
Replies
4
Views
4,628
Back
Top Bottom