A-B DeviceNet Communication

loosewire

Member
Join Date
Sep 2003
Location
Midwest
Posts
11
It's it better to locate a 1771-SDN DeviceNet card in the main chassis vs. in a remote rack (RIO)? Or, does it make any difference?

I have a PLC5/40 with a remote I/O rack that contains the 1771-SDN but I was expecting the communications to be of a higher speed. I realize DeviceNet is a non determistic network. I was wondering since I am using a remote I/O network to talk to the rack, if I eliminate the jump could it increase the update rate. The network is 500k baud, polled 1ms and currently only communicating to two non A-B motion controllers.

Thanks.
 
Yes, you will get a lot faster throughput if you put the devicenet scanner in the CPU chassis.

Block transfer to a module over RIO is limited to the speed of the RIO bus. So it will be a major bottleneck on the Devicenet speed.

Block transfer to a module in the CPU chassis goes over the chassis backplane, and as such is much faster.

Experiment with the two solutions, and see how different the block transfer "done" bits updates. You dont have to have any IO connected.
Remember to post your findings.
 
Yes, definitely put the SDN in the chassis with the processor for a major speed increase.

Also, make sure you only program the block transfers you need to get the data to/from the SDN. If you put in the 62, 61, 60, 59, etc. transfers but are only really using less than 62 words then you are wasting time transferring empty blocks of data.
 
WARNING!!

Also, note that if you use the additional block transfers that steve708 mentions (which you will want to if you want the node status information from the scanner) DO NOT configure the DeviceNet scanner through the IO Configuration utility from inside RSLogix 5!!! skuller

Your additional block transfers from the 1771-SDN will not work properly and the data will not be correct.

Darren
 
Good input

Thanks all for your input, it is appreciated. (y) I will see if I can move some I/O around and put the SDN in the main chassis. I was suspecting that it would be better.

Now let's just hope I shuffle around enough to free up a slot!
 

Similar Topics

We Sometimes face problems in Rx3i device-net module talking to a servo valve controller , How we can troubleshoot the communication issues ?
Replies
0
Views
1,467
hello everyone, i have an issue uploading parameters from 825-PD relay in rsnetworks for devicenet. all the other devices hase been uploaded in...
Replies
4
Views
1,865
hey, this my first time posting... we´ve been working with devicenet ,I hope somebody can help or talk about experience, it has safety...
Replies
5
Views
2,110
Hi! I wish a help with a problem communication. I'm trying to connect to a DeviceNet through a 1747-sdn scanner. I've been trying to connect...
Replies
4
Views
1,651
Hi all, Actually i'm having this doubt for longtime. But I cant get to know till now from any website. May be its funny but I really and clearly...
Replies
7
Views
4,274
Back
Top Bottom