Ethernet Comms Confusion

krakenfan69

Lifetime Supporting Member
Join Date
Nov 2011
Location
Alberta
Posts
229
I set up a CompactLogix PLC with a PV+600 (why they didnt get alarger dislay i will never understand) through a 5 port hub. comms are great and the pv sees the plc. if i then remove the hub and plug the PLC directy into the PV it con bo loger see the PLC. Add the hub back in and its good again. What gives? Clearly there is a piece to this setup I am failing to understand.

Kraken Fan #69
 
You know I'm not sure. It was in place when I got there and i didn't think to check. I did use that same cable to connect the PV to the hub however. It was not working when I arrived however as I was sent to dump in someone else's program and do loop checks. I'll check it in the morning. Thanks for the heads up guys.


Kraken Fan #69
 
Last edited:
Most hub's and switches are auto-crossing today.
So with a hub or switch with auto-crossing in the communication line, it makes no sense if you use Cross-cable or straight...

If you remove the switch or hub for a direct connection like you did, it makes sense like mentioned in the posts before.

Jack
 
When I got to site this morning I used a crossover adapter (Yeah, I didn't have a crossover cable but this thing I have. lol ) and it worked just fine. Plans now are to add a 24 industrail hub to make it eaiser to be online and still have PV comms.

Thanks again for all the help!

Kraken Fan #69
 
If you are going to put a hub in, make sure that somewhere in the panel you list all the IP addresses connected to it so that when the next person comes along they can pick an address that is not used, and not have to guess and possibly pick a duplicate address.

i wish all machine manufacturers and sites did this, as it would make connecting to there network so much easier.

Alan
 
Yeah we always put Dymo labels on the PLC and the HMI for easy reference. I also leave an Excel file with a list of all device IP addresses on location (or other locations if they are connected via radio) so we can keep track and make additions simpler.

Kraken Fan #69
 
I wish that something on an industrial network had a built in DHCP server so I could get assigned an unused address automatically.

Also, which CompactLogix are you using? If it's the old style(L23, L32, L35, L43, L45) then yes you most likely need a crossover cable. However, I wouldn't think you'd need a crossover cable on the newer 5370 CompactLogix controllers. I thought the built-in redundant Ethernet ports acted like a switch. There is the ability to disable one of these ports, although if you got the PLC new that's probably not the case.
 
The platform is a Compact Logix 1769-L32E. I have always ignorantly used the terms switch and hub interchangeably. 7-UP or Sprite anyone? After a quick google search on the difference in Hubs and Switches it will indeed be a switch. Although I don't claim to even yet fully grasp the diff. To me it sounds like the white zip tie vs black zip tie conundrum. Why would I ever use a white zip tie? Always use black (or a Switch )and only have to stock one type. (Yes I know they are a bit cheaper but really?) When would I ever choose to install a simple Hub?


Thanks again for all the help and by all means if someone would like to expand on the Switch vs Hub then please enlighten me further. Is everything on this site searchable or is there a way to add tags to different threads for later searches?

http://catalog.weidmueller.com/catalog/Start.do?localeId=en&ObjectID=8896940000

Kraken Fan #69
 
Last edited:
I wish that something on an industrial network had a built in DHCP server so I could get assigned an unused address automatically.

I wouldn't have a DHCP server assigning IP addresses to my control network devices.....

I presume you are talking about getting a "compatible" IP address for your laptop when you connect it to the switch?
 
I wouldn't have a DHCP server assigning IP addresses to my control network devices.....

Nothing wrong with it if done the right way. I sue DHCP persistence ( per port )with logix auto device config and it works well.

I have about 70 nodes on one line setup like that. You can also do DHCP per port for you programming port like a graceport or similar product where you would plug your laptop in.
 
Nothing wrong with it if done the right way. I sue DHCP persistence ( per port )with logix auto device config and it works well.

DHCP persistence - Not quite the same as vanilla DHCP, which just gives a spare address to the first device that asks for one. And gotta be a PITA if the switch fails.

I prefer, and recommend, to fix IP addresses on automation nets.

Each to their own....
 
I wouldn't have a DHCP server assigning IP addresses to my control network devices.....

I presume you are talking about getting a "compatible" IP address for your laptop when you connect it to the switch?


Yes, I am talking about programming computers only. I do like the idea of DHCP per port as mentioned above however.
 

Similar Topics

I have a relatively small network but I am having some issues with PowerFlex 755 drives (using the native ethernet card) Faulting with the F926...
Replies
0
Views
205
I have set up comms between an S7-1512SP-1 PN plc programmed with TIA v17 and an S7-314C programmed with Simatic S7 using GET and PUT blocks in...
Replies
4
Views
545
Studio 5000 & PF 525, Ethernet Comms, Encoder FB, Using Motor RPM as speed reference I'm trying to figure out how to send a speed reference in...
Replies
6
Views
924
One of my customers is interested in extracting some data from a machine running on an SLC503 and they really don't want to change the PLC in any...
Replies
5
Views
1,536
I'd like to be able to detect if the Ethernet Comms falls over between my PLC Ethernet card and any of the 5 PF525 inverters I have connected to...
Replies
7
Views
4,838
Back
Top Bottom