![]() |
||
|
This board is for PLC Related Q&A ONLY. Please DON'T use it for advertising, etc. |
||
| ||
New Here? Please read this important info!!!
|
|
#1 |
|
Lifetime Supporting Member
|
STep programming in S7, a question of a method
Hi,
I have to start-up a project from someone else. He makes steps like this: ![]() "DB aanvoer1".toestemming is needed for start-up in step/step. My question is, how does this work what you can see here. When "DB aanvoer1".toestemming is low, then we jump over the actions (to M051 in this case). When we dont run automatically but in step/step, then "DB scherm".stapknop is high. So I think that, each time we push the start button, "DB aanvoer1".toestemming is high until AN "P303+" is done, because scherm".stapknop is high, aanvoer1".toestemming will be resetted, and we then jump again over the actioncode. Okay, I think I'm on the right road. When scherm".stapknop is low, and we press start auto, then "DB aanvoer1".toestemming is high and we run through everything, because the JC will not jump. BUT Now see this: ![]() Here you can see that no action code is programmed, so this is more a wait step I guess ? Little question, how do you guys see this, is there a better method to do the same, have automatic mode and step/step possibillity ? |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Topics
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How would you solve this control problem? | Peter Nachtwey | LIVE PLC Questions And Answers | 19 | July 11th, 2007 03:04 PM |
| S5 to S7 conversion question (DL and DR) | Johnny T | LIVE PLC Questions And Answers | 2 | January 3rd, 2007 11:07 AM |
| PLC control of stage lights | Thesis | LIVE PLC Questions And Answers | 3 | June 21st, 2004 09:44 PM |
| S7 question | DeHulk | LIVE PLC Questions And Answers | 3 | April 7th, 2003 12:35 AM |
| very newbie question about simatic S7 PLCs | HG37 | LIVE PLC Questions And Answers | 5 | January 7th, 2003 11:36 AM |