Big Brother Is Watching!
Come, come my friend. Big Brother sees all...
msajid said:
...It would have been nice if you personally messaged me to ask about any concerns you had, instead of making assumptions...
I am not looking to publicly "chew you out" here. The reason I brought it up in public rather than in private is for informational or educational reasons. It is a public Forum. It's important that others who may have read it, or will read it in the future may now also consider their actions while kindly attempting to assist those in need. However hard I may seem on you, I'm doing it for your own good and the good of others.
I do apologize if I assumed incorrectly here, but I do feel it was/is a plausible assumption to make, given that the "Panelviewfix.jpg" screenshot that you attached is a direct screenshot of the locked Technote 55661 from the RA Knowledgebase, albeit with the header and footer removed, for, dare I assume, obscurity reasons, lest someone might notice where it was furnished from, such as myself.
msajid said:
...I am not sure what techconnect/ra knowladgebase you are talking about. The problems that I reply to on this site are things that i have faced in past and have found solution to through troubleshooting or simple web research. I don't have any tech support etc to give me solutions.
Ok, so you are denying having pictorially reproduced the aforementioned material, in part, from the contractually locked Technote 55661, or any other locked information, for that matter?
Reading the above would make one think you had never heard of either TechConnect or the RA Knowledgebase. Yet you do use the Knowledgebase, yes? You accessed it earlier this year to view a Technote related to FactoryTalk View Legacy Tag Database Conversion Tool. If you do not have a TechConnect Support contract, with which to access locked information, then how do you also explain having recently linked the "OpeningPDFviaFoxit.doc" file from the bottom of a TechConnect level Technote related to Foxit Reader?
If you did not pictorially reproduce in part, the locked Technote 55661, and you did not attach in another thread the aforementioned document, then would you be so kind as to divulge where you found this material by using "simple web research". I'm not too shabby with Google, but I couldn't find any links with references to the even the text of 55661, let alone an image of the actual locked TechConnect page. And funnily enough, a Google search for "OpeningPDFviaFoxit.doc" shows up 1 result, your post on this Forum.
What I was, or perhaps still am suggesting, may be based on conjecture, but you would appear to be denying having reproduced this material, when all evidence points to the contrary. Your apparent denial is serving to make more of an example out of your self than I could ever achieve. You cannot say you didn't do it, while thanking me for pointing out that you did. If I were you, and wrongly accused, I would be incensed.
The game is up my friend! :nodi:
You are a relatively new contributor to the Forum, and I'm sure it will be the better for it. I am just trying to dissuade you from this apparently blatant, but I'm sure unintentional practice, before it becomes a habit too hard to break.
Remember, I never said "do not do it". I said to use your nut, and not do it so blatantly. :site:
Peace,
George
