CompactLogix I/O expansion

Jim Diesel

Member
Join Date
Apr 2019
Location
Kentucky
Posts
4
Hello everyone,

I'm looking to add more IO to a CompactLogix 1769-L30ER, currently I'm using all 8 of the local expansion modules. I need to add one 1769-IA16 and one 1769-0A16 module, the current enclosure unfortunately will not handle anymore expansion so a new enclosure right next to the current one would be needed. My first thought was to upgrade to a L33ER and use a Compact IO bus expansion cable, but it looks like these cables only go to a maximum of 3'.

Looking for some options, does the L30ER or L33ER support remote I/O if so how is this achieved with Rockwell components?

Thanks!!
 
Thank you!

After some research, it supports the IO modules I want to add. Another question is on the controller, the specs says it can only handle 8 expansion modules. Does that include remote IO modules as well or just the local bus of the controller?
 
Manual says 8 local expansion modules. So it is for the local ones. For the remote IOs you will have limitation on the number of Ethernet/IP nodes, which is 16 for L30ER.
 
Another question is on the controller, the specs says it can only handle 8 expansion modules. Does that include remote IO modules as well or just the local bus of the controller?

No the 8 module limit is for the local I/O only. You can add remote I/O using the 1769-AENTR. It is a very simple thing to add to you system. In addition to the AENTR and I/O Modules you want to use, you will need to add a 1769 power supply and a 1769-ECR to complete your remote rack.

After you have it installed you just add the AENTR to the I/O Tree in Studio 5K, then add the I/O under that. Your I/O tags will be added to your program with the name like Remote_IO_Name:Module #.(I or O).DATA. Example RIO_1:1.I.DATA.0.

Hope this helps
 
You could use Point I/O (1734) in a similar manner but a different form factor. It all depends on how firmly invested you are in 1769 I/O.

Keith
 
You could use Point I/O (1734) in a similar manner but a different form factor. It all depends on how firmly invested you are in 1769 I/O.

Keith


Or Flex and Flex 5000 adapters and I/O. Personally I'm a fan of the Point I/O stuff. Flex is nice if you want to save a tiny bit of space, and you want less dense wiring.
 
You could use Point I/O (1734) in a similar manner but a different form factor. It all depends on how firmly invested you are in 1769 I/O.

Keith

I second this option. I have numerous CompactLogix racks which communicate with 1734 pointIO racks in the field. They're easy to configure over ethernet and provide the same capability as the local 1769 modules.
 

Similar Topics

Hi, I am currently working on a migration project (form micrologix 1500 to compactlogix L30 ER Controller). I successfully migrated all I/Os to...
Replies
12
Views
5,023
Hi Guys, I have a 1769-L23E system setup with one additional expansion input module. Now i need to add a few more I/O modules to cater for...
Replies
1
Views
2,286
Hi everyone, i have a compact logic 1769-L18 PLC and I'm using FTalk View ME for the display. I wanted to do some visualization on Grafana. At...
Replies
1
Views
82
Does anyone know what the data transfer rate for this series of CompactLogix PLC's? 1769-L24ER-QB1B to be exact. Cheers.
Replies
1
Views
85
Does this instruction calculate values during a single scan, or does it require number of scans based on element count in the array? For Example...
Replies
3
Views
104
Back
Top Bottom