Waking this thread back up for some help on this subject. What is the difference between the OPCWorx Proxy (which seems to be legacy), and the OPC UA Server? From what I gather, both can be used to share data between redlion devices, but the opc ua seems to be a more current standard for directly sharing data amongst devices and scadas without any other software. The OPC UA data tags are automatically discovered from the device over the network, similar to a BACnet network.
I've been developing hmi's using graphites at the machine level for quite some time and am now developing a supervisory hmi. What direction would one want to go in for this? My end goal is to have an "off the shelf" product with one supervisory level configuration that doesn't have to be linked to each HMI on the test bench before shipping out the entire system. If I want to add another HMI at the machine level by the end user in the field, do those tags need to be linked at the supervisory configuration specifically for that device? Other than the obvious IP address, is there some sort of unique identifier (e.g.: a mac address or some other info specific to the single HMI) that would require the exact new device be present on the network when adding those tags?
Hope that makes sense.