Measuring water level in a tank

For example they have used Thermocouples on a low temperature range instead of PT's it is well known these are not very accurate at low temperatures/QUOTE]


That's not strictly true. If the reference junction temperatues are close to the measurement junction temperatures then yes, the voltages produced are very small, EDIT : ergo difficult to measure with any degree of accuracy.

However, the reference junction does not have to be 0 deg. C, you can make them whatever temperature you want, so long as you take this into account.

And on the subject of thermocouples, what most people do not realise is that the junction itself produces no potential difference, it can't they are electrically bonded and therefore must be at the same potential.

It is the differing potential difference along the connecting wires due to the Seebeck effect that you can measure, that is why there are always two different metals involved in the "wires" to the thermocouple junction.
 
Last edited:
Using copper cable from a junction box to the card instead of TC cables it in effect produces a second thermocouple at the terminals (dis- similar metals).
This even happens when the TC cable is run directly to the card as the print/internal wires to the components is usually copper that is why there is a compensation RTD normally fitted at the card.
Mas01 has proved this by wiring the RTD compensation terminals through to the junction box and moving the RTD cold Junction compensator to the box, this has removed the error he was getting.
The pic shows the typical advantages/disadvantages, there is also a cost parameter. However, As far as I'm aware the temperatures he is measuring do not appear to be critical (well the ones he is adding) so not a problem but in saying that, this is a test rig for something that cannot be shown due to company policy so it is more than likely that there could be that the many other sensors are used for critical measurement, As I said before, I have seen some of the code and it is my impression that this rig has been designed with cost in mind rather than accuracy there are some fudges that have been implemented that I find a little disturbing and poor programming, in saying that this rig has been upgraded by a later version of PLC and perhaps may be not by the original designer.

Comparison.png
 

Similar Topics

I try to find sensor for measuring ethanol in water in search engines. But there are little topics involve. Does anyone know which sensor can...
Replies
3
Views
5,098
Hi everyone, I don't know much of PLCs but it happened that i need to connect Leuze AMS358i Ethernet laser measurement to Productivity 1000...
Replies
0
Views
1,061
Hello everyone! Firstly I'd like to say that I'm new to this forum and also new to PLC programming world altogether, that said I really would...
Replies
27
Views
4,836
I am looking for a way to determine level in a silo. The material is called Perilite which has a very light density. Bulk density could be...
Replies
10
Views
2,748
Hello, I have an application where I need to measure the salt level/volume in a salt saturator. This is a fairly large tank where we load bulk...
Replies
21
Views
6,505
Back
Top Bottom