Terminal usage

Rson

Member
Join Date
Jun 2017
Location
Michigan
Posts
520
I just wanted to get some feedback here.

I started working with a new panel shop that thinks I’m using WAY to few terminals. I get out to the shop and find out that they are only using the top of the terminals – the bottom are completely empty.

The panel builder claims that our jobs are always empty on the bottom and that was a requested spec. I looked back and some other panels we sent there (from my predecessor) and he’s correct – all the panels are using only the top of the terminal block and the bottom is completely empty.

Personally, I’ve always been taught that terminals are just for connections outside the panel (or in this case for a door harness as well) I’ve always used the top/bottom of each terminal.

Is there any reason or have you heard of any company spec that says use one side only?
 
Well usually connections from a source/device (plc for example) to terminal array are connected on the top. The bottom of those terminals would be for the destination/device/external connections (drive for example).
 
Exactly my thought.

Looks like both were run to the top on all projects we did here in the past - bottom never used!
 
I think it's good practice to have a dedicated "field duct" for terminals. In some cases, that might mean the bottom of the terminals. I'm with the panel builder. I have seen this in numerous specifications as well.
 
To confirm: your panel shop is putting two conductors into the top of each Terminal Block, instead of one conductor on the bottom and one conductor on the top ?

That's like putting both your feet in your left shoe.

Or are you talking about terminals that are bus-connected together for distribution, where each conductor is placed in its own termination point.

For distribution, that sounds like a conservative practice that leaves plenty of room for future expansion and keeps conductors of a similar purpose in the same wireway.

I like to have external wiring come to one side, and internal wiring to the other. That seldom survives the connection of field devices, but we all have aspirations.
 
To confirm: your panel shop is putting two conductors into the top of each Terminal Block, instead of one conductor on the bottom and one conductor on the top ?

That's like putting both your feet in your left shoe.

Or are you talking about terminals that are bus-connected together for distribution, where each conductor is placed in its own termination point.

For distribution, that sounds like a conservative practice that leaves plenty of room for future expansion and keeps conductors of a similar purpose in the same wireway.

I like to have external wiring come to one side, and internal wiring to the other. That seldom survives the connection of field devices, but we all have aspirations.

Yes, confirming your first scenario - only wires on the top - none on bottom.

Single-feed terminals.

Some terminals did have more than one wire in top - but most had a single wire in top.

Basically, instead of using the bottom of the terminal, they added a 2nd terminal of the same name with screw-jumpers. It nearly doubled the intended terminals in the panel.
 
Here is an attached example.

I guess I can see the idea of it keeping the duct below it clear for field wiring.

I would almost like to find a multi-level terminal that has 2 connections on the top and 1 on the bottom in cases like this.
 
Here is an attached example.

I guess I can see the idea of it keeping the duct below it clear for field wiring.

I would almost like to find a multi-level terminal that has 2 connections on the top and 1 on the bottom in cases like this.

The picture is not showing up for me. Try resizing it. If you need a really good free photo editor, getpaint.net
 
Sorry about the picture thing.

They show up on my side, but when I check on the forum - nothing.

I'll get a zip file or something together later
 

Similar Topics

Hello, I purchased some Weidmuller ZQV 2.5 terminal block for a build that is in the design phase. As this is my first control system...
Replies
6
Views
3,997
In the past, we have used AB 1492 feed thru screw terminals a lot. Lead time on these with our distributor is terrible. Is there an almost...
Replies
1
Views
89
I'm trying to include MOVs and fuses for solenoid PLC outputs in a panel with limited space. Does anyone know of terminal blocks that have built...
Replies
7
Views
219
Hi all, i have several Proface GT2400 terminals and i need to get the software and interface cables and i have several questions. I am assuming...
Replies
3
Views
152
I work in a field where our plc and hmi are constantly being powered fully off and on daily before being sent out. I am new to the world of plc...
Replies
5
Views
956
Back
Top Bottom