Contradiction on Rockwell instruction

LucaPLC

Member
Join Date
Jun 2017
Location
Home
Posts
3
Hi guys,
I'm working on AB code but I'm in trouble with the specifics on the MAPC command and his behaviour with the Execution Schedule parameter.
Please confirm or "fix" my idea:

(The Execution Mode is always = Continuous)

- Immediate with Master Reference = Actual --> The camming starts immediately when the MAPC is enabled (Master Lock Position ignored);
- Immediate with Master Reference = Command --> The camming starts when the master axis reach the Master Lock Position;

- Pending with Master Reference = Actual --> the camming starts immediately when the pending cam ends independently of the master axis position (Master Lock Position ignored);
- Pending with Master Reference = Command --> when the pending cam ends, the slave axis continues in velocity until the master axis reach the Master Lock Position (where the new camming starts).

I hope someone can resolve my dubts.
Thanks.
Luca
 

Similar Topics

I have a PH meter that I am trying to bring its data into 1756-L81. I have downloaded the Rockwell MODBUS AOI kit, but I am not sure if I need to...
Replies
5
Views
151
Hi all. Customer wants analog faceplates really bad, even if we explained that it doesn't make much sense in his process. What he wants to see...
Replies
5
Views
110
Hello, recently I saw a graphic from any Rockwell App, I cant identify which one is. Attached a SS. Its used to see dashboard from datapoints and...
Replies
2
Views
127
I'm working with a project that contains some routines in ST but mostly in ladder. Am I correct in assuming this 'rung': DB1001DO._01AV55_OPEN :=...
Replies
4
Views
113
I noticed in Rockwell AOIs, they add a BOOL Output parameter at the end of the "Parameters" list of each AOI that carries the same name as the...
Replies
1
Views
75
Back
Top Bottom