Factory Talk SE & Kepware

janner_10

Lifetime Supporting Member
Join Date
Dec 2014
Location
Tewkesbury
Posts
1,301
Using Kepware v6 and FTSE v10

We can read the Kepware tags in RSL Enterprise, so can display them on a screen.

However, the strange behaviour is, if we try and use a derived tag from a Kepware tag or a HMI Tag from a Kepware tag, it doesn't work.

The derived tag will report the expression contains an error, when it clearly doesn't.

I've tried Floats, Words & Bool, but nothing.

I spent an hour on the phone to tech support yesterday and still no joy.

Anyone else experienced this and found a solution?
 
Is the Kepware server installed on the FTView PC?
Do you have the Kepware server installed in the FTView tree? With the correct OPC Server Name?

Yes and yes.

I can read all the tags from Kepware, FTSE just won't write them to either a HMI Tag or a Derived tag.
 
They are not, but I'm only reading from Kepware, FTSE is doing the writing to itself and the CLX.

It's had me head scratching for 2 days now!
 
<quote>FTSE is doing the writing to itself and the CLX.</quote>
That isn't making sense to me.

FTVSE has to READ the tag from the Kepware server.
If you haven't, also try re initializing the Kepware server.

Show me an actual IO Tag as you have it defined in the Tag Database.
 
Last edited:
Apologies, I missed your reply, but it cropped up when I googled my problem again.

Here is the tag displaying on the screen:

aad402.png


Live View:

11toeu8.png


Derived Details:

35by13r.png


I've started, stopped the derived tags, the HMI server, the Project, the PC - you name it!

Interestingly, the HMI tags reads nothing also if I create one and point it to the Kepware tag.

Always this error, no matter what data type. Never had this problem before v10

ng1s7l.png
 
Try creating a tag in the tag database, but in your device path, precede it with ::
I haven't used Kepware with FTView, but generally for ANY tag that has a colon in the tag's device path, you need to precede it with :: (colon colon).
Give that a shot.
 
Thanks for the suggestion, sadly it didn't work.

I deleted the Kepware Area from the project and re-added but as a OPC UA Server instead of a DA and it works perfectly.

No rhyme or reason as DA has worked fine historically.
 
Thanks for the suggestion, sadly it didn't work.

I deleted the Kepware Area from the project and re-added but as a OPC UA Server instead of a DA and it works perfectly.

No rhyme or reason as DA has worked fine historically.

DOH!!!!
I didn't see you mention you were using DA! DA (and, for that matter, AE, HDA and the like) should be considered depricated and avoided if at all possible today. They rely on DCOM, and are seriously OS dependent. With DCOM being frowned upon security wise, you need to very explicitly open up DCOM channels deep inside the component services bowels of Windows.

UA can effectively talk to all prior classes, DA, HDA, AE, etc, but internally is completely platform independent, and doesn't use DCOM anywhere. UA typically uses either TCP/IP, or in some cases HTTPS to link to the client software (HMI/SCADA) through a nice, simple, standard interface.

Save some frustration next time around, only use UA and it's future derivatives going forward!

73's
 

Similar Topics

I have a project where I'm trying to bring in data from a Quantum processor to a FT view SE 6.1 application. I've set up the KEP server and can...
Replies
1
Views
7,594
Hi Friends; I have a red Explanation Mark on Factory Talk Directory in Task Bar. Before Update the windows and installation of AutoCad it works...
Replies
0
Views
27
I am trying to enable an external alarm via computer speakers for Factory Talk Network Distributed Edition. I am using Alarm and Events setup. I...
Replies
7
Views
160
We have a quad monitor setup with FT SE and we are utilizing a header screen at the top of every display. when we open a new page we abort the...
Replies
0
Views
86
Good day colleagues, I have a problem with a plc slc 5 since I export the tags to my factory program to load them into a panel view 1000 plus 6...
Replies
0
Views
103
Back
Top Bottom