I usually agree with the better idiot proposal. But I think maybe in the case of traffic lights, it is actually a logical progressive improvement, not a fix for idiots.
It gets back to the laws of motion (inertia in particular). A body in motion tends to stay in motion and a stopped body wants to stay stopped. Why should a line of cars traveling through a light at maybe 45 MPH have to come to a sudden stop (when the line of cars in the opposite direction is stopped and will need several seconds to get moving due to the same law of motion)?
Probably if traffic lights had been well-designed, they would have employed the delayed green from Day 1. I suppose the first ones had to take into account some remaining horses and wagons, so it was a different ball game.
It gets back to the laws of motion (inertia in particular). A body in motion tends to stay in motion and a stopped body wants to stay stopped. Why should a line of cars traveling through a light at maybe 45 MPH have to come to a sudden stop (when the line of cars in the opposite direction is stopped and will need several seconds to get moving due to the same law of motion)?
Probably if traffic lights had been well-designed, they would have employed the delayed green from Day 1. I suppose the first ones had to take into account some remaining horses and wagons, so it was a different ball game.
Last edited: