Useful features

I would stay with Rockwell they have a big lead in technology


Their ladder editor is the best. I haven't heard anyone say they



their processing speed is faster then most others


In my experience, across brands, processing speed and memory are mostly only limited by how much you spend on the PLC. At least according to the published specs, the 1518 from Siemens is twice as fast as the L8x. I'd say with any brand I've used, the biggest PLC I could get was sized in the range of "do I REALLY need all of this in the same PLC, or would it be simpler to break this up?".



I'm not saying Rockwell is bad, or that they should be avoided or anything, but I'm thinking your glasses are a little rosy colored.
 
I'm not saying Rockwell is bad, or that they should be avoided or anything, but I'm thinking your glasses are a little rosy colored.

I have a friend with a bald patch and rose tinted glasses....

Makes for interesting pub chats 🍻
 
Personal view here - Siemens is clunky, software maintenance is expensive.


Schneider software is really only suited to ST in FBs - hardware is expensive, software maintenance is expensive. Big plus is the ease of adding to FBS - a good feature.


RA is a bit clunky, hardware is expensive, software maintenance is expensive.


My preference is by far Omron - hardware prices are reasonable, buy the software and no update costs for about 7 years now - just update on the web, I am using the older series - still current and still new products coming out - uses CX-One - best ladder editor about for mine and soes have ST and FBs as well. I have not used the newer designs with auto I/O allocation at all or Sysmac Studio - the European guys seem to like it as it is more suited to ST but still has ladder that is OK and FBs. Full of structures and arrays and the like - same deal with the software.


I do use them all from time to time and have done a couple of jobs with the VERY expensive Schneider M580 dual redundant system - the price is ouch!


I would also say that for smaller jobs I would certainly use the AD stuff - the newer Click Ethernet processors finally have a decent amount of memory so online programming can be performed and they are inexpensive. The software is fine to use. Biggest problem I have in Australia is the absolutely lousy trading terms from the distributor here.


It may be good to have a look at Emerson as well - formally GE - they have some nice stuff but I have not looked at the software maintenance costs as I have not used one at this stage but did quote a couple of dual redundant jobs instead of quoting the very expensive Schneider system - no racks and even the processors were about 1/3rd of the price.
 
Last edited:

Similar Topics

I am deciding on components for a bayed modular enclosure containing multiple VFDs (480V/350A/321Hp each) for a dynamometer. I am concerned given...
Replies
7
Views
1,698
I've been banging my head for a way to generalize data handling in a meaningful way in Logix. What I've concocted so far is the idea of "visitors"...
Replies
28
Views
5,451
Seeing a lot of job ads that have that as a line item of desired/required skills. I have never had to touch c/c++ to be an effective controls...
Replies
26
Views
5,649
Hy , so here is my problem. I what to make a program for a S5 100U PLC, the application consist in rejecting, lets say a blue cube, from a...
Replies
4
Views
1,741
Hi all. During a rummage in a dark and dusty corner today, I found an unopened RSLogix500 :) but the version was "one point something" :( (it was...
Replies
6
Views
2,061
Back
Top Bottom