You are not registered yet. Please click here to register!


 
 
plc storereviewsdownloads
This board is for PLC Related Q&A ONLY. Please DON'T use it for advertising, etc.
 
Try our online PLC Simulator- FREE.  Click here now to try it.

---------->>>>>Get FREE PLC Programming Tips

New Here? Please read this important info!!!


Go Back   PLCS.net - Interactive Q & A > PLCS.net - Interactive Q & A > LIVE PLC Questions And Answers

PLC training tools sale

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 5th, 2006, 07:16 PM   #1
donl517
Member
United States

donl517 is offline
 
donl517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 124
Angry USB & 1747-pic / AIC+ Driver

Is there no compatible solution for this? I feel like I am in the stone ages here. Does AB think comp manufacturers are going to start putting serial ports back in laptops just for them. I would really like to move on and upgrade. I have tried 3 different USB to Serial adapters today to no avail. Any suggestions?

Thanks,
Don
  Reply With Quote
Old June 5th, 2006, 07:19 PM   #2
TWControls
Lifetime Supporting Member
United States

TWControls is offline
 
TWControls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 1,924
1747-UIC is a USB replacement for the 1747-PIC
  Reply With Quote
Old June 5th, 2006, 07:22 PM   #3
TConnolly
Lifetime Supporting Member
United States

TConnolly is offline
 
TConnolly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 5,418
Quote:
Originally Posted by donl517
Does AB think comp manufacturers are going to start putting serial ports back in laptops just for them.
Nope. That is why they released the UIC product. Just as you once had to throw away an old laptop, its time to throw away the PIC.

There are also some thrid party adaptors available.

note:
Do not confuse the DB9 port on the UIC with a normal USB-RS232 converter. The entire UIC, both ports, are strictly DH485 converters. You still need a normal USB-RS232 to talk to serial DF-1 devices such as the Micrologix, SLC 5/03 and above, CLX, etc.

Last edited by TConnolly; June 5th, 2006 at 07:26 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old June 5th, 2006, 07:26 PM   #4
donl517
Member
United States

donl517 is offline
 
donl517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 124
Do I need to reinstall rslinx with this driver selected? I do not see it in the list.

Thanks,
Don
  Reply With Quote
Old June 5th, 2006, 07:28 PM   #5
TConnolly
Lifetime Supporting Member
United States

TConnolly is offline
 
TConnolly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 5,418
Refer to this technote:



http://domino.automation.rockwell.co...6?OpenDocument
  Reply With Quote
Old June 5th, 2006, 07:58 PM   #6
jwhitesock
Member
United States

jwhitesock is offline
 
jwhitesock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 12
http://domino.automation.rockwell.co...5?OpenDocument
__________________
REALITY SUCKS!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old June 5th, 2006, 08:16 PM   #7
Ken Roach
Lifetime Supporting Member + Moderator
United States

Ken Roach is offline
 
Ken Roach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 8,582
Please note carefully the last line of the technote jwhitesock referenced: "These converters will not work with DH-485 protocol."


I work for Rockwell Automation and run serial interfaces to various controllers every day.

My recommendations for USB interfaces are:

1747-UIC for DH-485 connectivity

Keyspan HS19 for DF1, Modbus, and ASCII connectivity

__________________
"Intelligence is the capacity to know what we are doing and instinct is just instinct. The results are about the same."
  Reply With Quote
Old June 5th, 2006, 09:56 PM   #8
jwhitesock
Member
United States

jwhitesock is offline
 
jwhitesock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 12
What a pain to have to carry around all those cables and adaptors Ken. When will Rockwell start making things more user friendly as technology advances instead of more complicated!!
__________________
REALITY SUCKS!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old June 5th, 2006, 10:22 PM   #9
Alan Case
Lifetime Supporting Member
Australia

Alan Case is offline
 
Alan Case's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wagga Wagga
Posts: 1,249
Bit of a harsh comment. How was Rockwell to know 10 years ago that the serial port which was an industry standard and on every computer ever made was going to be deleted due to cost reasons from computers made in 2006.
Regards Alan Case
  Reply With Quote
Old June 5th, 2006, 10:51 PM   #10
Mickey
Lifetime Supporting Member
United States

Mickey is offline
 
Mickey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Palmdale,Ca
Posts: 7,519
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwhitesock
What a pain to have to carry around all those cables and adaptors Ken. When will Rockwell start making things more user friendly as technology advances instead of more complicated!!
In addition to Alan's comment Rockwell did make things more
user friendly with the 1747-UIC for DH485 comm.
__________________
Mickey

If you want happiness for an hour-take a nap. If you want happiness for a day-go fishing. If you want happiness for a month-getmarried. If you want happiness for a year-inherit a fortune. If you want happiness for a lifetime-help someone else.
----- Chinese Proverb
  Reply With Quote
Old June 5th, 2006, 11:51 PM   #11
jwhitesock
Member
United States

jwhitesock is offline
 
jwhitesock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 12
Don't get me wrong, I use AB products everyday and I like them. It’s just frustrating that every time Rockwell updates there software and products it seems to be more complicated. Shouldn't things get easier with newer technology? Sorry about the harsh comment I didn't mean it that way. And I totally agree how were they to know that the PC industry would dump the serial port. That's another frustration I have.
__________________
REALITY SUCKS!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2006, 12:37 AM   #12
IASSJRZ
Member
Mexico

IASSJRZ is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cd Juarez
Posts: 12
I Changed PIC for PCMCIA, with this board you have never had the same problem, the only is expensive but is very usefull, compact, also it fits in all new computers.

could work.
  Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2006, 03:59 AM   #13
504bloke
Lifetime Supporting Member + Moderator
England

504bloke is offline
 
504bloke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: West Ssx
Posts: 2,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwhitesock
What a pain to have to carry around all those cables and adaptors Ken. When will Rockwell start making things more user friendly as technology advances instead of more complicated!!
I have a hard case specially for all my cables.

AB - RS232, panelviews, PCMK, Devicenet PCMCIA and Serial, Ethernet, PIC, USB_PIC

Mitsi Sc03, SC09, HMIs (MAC)

Redlion Usb Cable

SSD Drives Serial Cable

Siemens S5 serial convertor, S7 PPI and MPI

Klockner Moeller Logo, PS3, PS4
__________________
Regards

Dave



"When you are courting a nice girl an hour seems like a second. When you sit on a red-hot cinder a second seems like an hour. That's relativity."
Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
  Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2006, 07:01 AM   #14
donl517
Member
United States

donl517 is offline
 
donl517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 124
Thumbs down

AB:

"Our goal is to allow our customers to use these newer laptops without redesigning all of our RS-232-based products."

ME:

"My goal is to never let another customer use DH485 as a protocol. (since that is more convienent for me then spending $216.00 on a converter)"

LOL, How can they expect everyone to keep jumping through hoops for them. I can't dictate to my customer or futhermore their other vendors which protocols to use. If you can't make it work then scrap it completely and don't offer it as an option. Or, and I can't believe I am even suggesting this, update your product. :-o But don't give me another high priced component I have to purchase to make it work.

1764LRP AB PROC. UNIT W/RS232 PORT MLOGIX 1500 = $304.48

For now I guess I will resurrect the pheonix.

Have a great and prosperous day!
Don

Last edited by donl517; June 6th, 2006 at 07:03 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2006, 07:55 AM   #15
ALVIN DAVIS
Member
United States

ALVIN DAVIS is offline
 
ALVIN DAVIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SC
Posts: 35
Angry

Don
I feel your pain. But like Dave I have one bag just for cables. I work for a company that makes custom machinery and have been doing field srevice work for 20 years. So I have cables and adpts. that don't get used much but I still have them for customer supp.
Oh and how about the old OS that I have to keep. some in DOS that will not run on XP.
Just keep on smiling
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Jump to Live PLC Question and Answer Forum

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SLC500 5/02. 1747 PIC okay. 1747 UIC No GO Philadelphia Frank LIVE PLC Questions And Answers 5 May 19th, 2010 09:46 PM
Using AB PIC driver with a virtual serial port DanYost LIVE PLC Questions And Answers 2 June 1st, 2006 03:41 PM
USB conversion for Allen Bradley SCL500 Interface Convertor 1747 PIC samdutton LIVE PLC Questions And Answers 10 May 16th, 2006 03:44 AM
1747 PIC to USB 2.0? zqew05 LIVE PLC Questions And Answers 5 January 6th, 2004 06:18 PM
Different RSlinx drivers TimeFluxCap LIVE PLC Questions And Answers 22 November 25th, 2003 07:56 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:13 PM.


.