![]() |
||
|
This board is for PLC Related Q&A ONLY. Please DON'T use it for advertising, etc. |
||
| ||
New Here? Please read this important info!!!
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
SoftLogix5 and RSLinx Enterprise--can they play nice together?
Greetings all, short-time responder, first-time posting question...
Has anyone been able to successfully communicate to a SoftLogix5 controller (software version of PLC-5) using RSView SE and RSLinx Enterprise? I am creating a training scenario for a customer, and I was *hoping* to be able to simulate (in class) an Ethernet PLC-5 using SoftLogix5 instead of having to ship a PLC demo to the site. The customer is running a distributed RSView SE system, and has recently changed data servers from RSLinx Classic to RSLinx Enterprise. In my test lab, I am banging my head against the wall trying to establish a connection between RSView Studio software and the SoftLogix5 controller. I know that there is no problem communicating using RSLinx Classic, but this defeats the purpose. In RSLinx Enterprise, I can add a SoftLogix controller to the Ethernet driver, but whenever a browse occurs, the Softlogix device disappears, indicating that it is not being seen on the network. Does anyone have any suggestions, or am I stuck with going the hardware route. More details on the setup: RSView SE version 3.2 SoftLogix v.2.1 SoftLogix Winsock32 TCP/IP driver installed. Both machines (one running SoftLogix and one running RSView Studio) are on the same Ethernet subnet. I attempted running all software from same machine, with unsuccessful communication as well. I tend to believe that the failure on the single computer is because I did not set up Linx Enterprise and Linx Classic to run side-by-side; not sure if this would help. Let me know if you have any other questions. Rick |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Auckland
Posts: 1,134
|
I think you're out of luck.
I tried this once using Studio ver 3.1 and PV+. When running the application on my PC it would communicate with the SL5, but not from the PV+. I eventually came across some documentation (can't remember where) confirming that behaviour. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|