![]() |
||
|
This board is for PLC Related Q&A ONLY. Please DON'T use it for advertising, etc. |
||
| ||
New Here? Please read this important info!!!
|
|
#1 |
|
Lifetime Supporting Member
|
Thermocouple rectifier?
In this particular app the customer has a heated/cooled mold with a TC probe in the mold. Electrical contact is made with probe pads when the mold is clamped. Sometimes the operator can put the probe in upside down, and the part will be scrap. The customer needs a way to rectify the voltage from the TC so that it does not matter which way the probe is placed and he would prefer to not have to take time to align the positon of the probe and mold. He wants a "slap it in and push go" solution for max throughput.
I considered bringing the mV signal into the PLC and doing the polarity adjustments in software and linearizing it myself, but I'm looking for a better way. Rectifiers usually cause a slight voltage drop and I think would be unsuitable for use with thermocouples, or am I up in the night? Has anyone heard of such a device? Any ideas? Last edited by TConnolly; July 28th, 2006 at 12:05 PM. |
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 550
|
Quote:
I'm afraid that this problem can't be corrected at the panel. You need to ensure that the operator aligns the mold so that the device is connected properly. I would look into modifying the mold to make it asymetrical (only able to go one way) if possible, and clearly labled if that isn't an option. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,050
|
Can you go to a non contact thermocouple?
Is it the + - leads that are getting flipped, or is it the probe being put in completely upside down? |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Lifetime Supporting Member
|
Maybe you should switch to RTD's.
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,050
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
|
Thermocouple rectifier? Sorry, no such animal. Rectification is the process of changing AC to DC. The milivolt signal from a TC is already DC and therefore can not be rectified, no need. Perhaps you are thinking of some other polarity sensing situation, but rectifier is the totally wrong idea.
__________________
Thunder is good, thunder is impressive; but it is lightning that does the work! Mark Twain-8/28/1908 |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Lifetime Supporting Member
|
I guess I should have been more specific. A bridge rectifier is what I was thinking of. A bridge rectifier can not only used to change AC to DC, but it can also assure that the polarity of a DC signal is always the same. Its done all of the time. The problem I see here is the voltage drop across the rectifier, not that its already a DC signal. Thanks for the input though.
Jimbo, This is an S type TC probe (expen$ive) so the extension leads are both copper (platinum's seebeck coefficient is 0) so it shouldn't matter which way its connected except at the instrument itself. Thats one reason a S type probe was selected. I really wish it was as simple as chaning the molds, but in this app that will cost several hundred thousand dollars, and that is out of the question. Ron's suggestion for an RTD is very clever since RTDs don't care about polarity and it wouldn't matter which pad the third lead was on, or better yet, 4 leads could be used. Unfortunately I don't know of any RTD that has a wide enough temperature range. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
|
I figured you meant something else, that is why I posted my reply. The diodes in the bridge or any other for that matter will require about .6 volts to put them into forward biased condition. The TC will not produce that kind of voltage and as you said, the drop would kill your accuracy.
__________________
Thunder is good, thunder is impressive; but it is lightning that does the work! Mark Twain-8/28/1908 |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
|
I'm still confusted about the real problem, but it seems the T/C gets installed somehow or oterh so that when it is connected it's reverse polarity on the input.
I have connected a single T/C to more than one input dozens of times, sometimes on two different devices (controller and high limit). Years ago there could be problems with cold junction compensation and T/C break detection. Improvements in analog input technology have made those issures largely disappear. Why not take whatever leads you have coming out and conect two sets of extension leads to those two T/C wires. Run one set of extension leads to input A and wire it for standard polarity. Run the other set of extension leads to input B and wire it for reverse polarity. One input will read OK, the other won't. Pick the right one. All it costs you is a econd AI input. Dan |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,170
|
One method that I can think of is to replace the T/C with a Thermistor-type detector, and of course, the appropriate controller.
Of course... that might not get much money for you. Alternatively... you could talk them into modifying the mold and the T/C so that they have a keyway which would insure correct installation when assembled... thus forcing correct installation. That won't get much money for you either. That might be a deal-killer... however, a little bit of clever thinking goes a long way! How about simply inserting a pin into the T/C connector and a matching hole in the mold? Do they have a macine shop? Another option would be to modify the T/C connector in some way so that there is an additional set of contacts. That additional set of contacts, on the Mold side, would be connected to a diode (internal in the connector). The diode would be oriented to indicate proper installation. An external source would be applied, through a load, to those additional contacts. The source could be a simple 5V-DC. That circuit could then be run through a 5V PLC Input... or, through an opto-isolator which controls a 24V-DC source, or a 120V-AC source, to a PLC Input. If the PLC "sees the light" from the opto-isolator... then the PLC sends a signal to the temperature controller indicating that the probe is correctly oriented. Until the PLC "sees the light"... the controller is prevented from operating. You could make a few bucks on that one... however... modifying the Mold and/or the T/C might be a deal-killer. Although... if thought through... it could be a minor modification. I've got yet another idea... one that doesn't involve any modification to the T/C or the mold... but I'll have to do a bit of thinkin' (MGD) to realize it! Hint: Milli-Voltage Controlled Opto-Isolator (as opposed to current controlled). This would function, or not function, in a polarity sensitive manner. |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Lifetime Supporting Member
|
I believe Alaric is actually thinking of a Wheatstone bridge system like a Thermistor would use. A thermistor nor RTD will usually go to the 2500 deg F range which is what I assume Alaric needs.
I am cofused how a probe could be put in upside down, the connector should only be able to connect one way using proper polarity, at least those I am familiar with. Is there a special reason the probe has to be put in a certain way physically?? May just want to go to www.omega.com and use their configurator to see if you can find a different type probe that will work in the application. If all of what I said is bullcrap then it may be easier to take it to the plc. Using a signal conditioner to change the signal to 4-20ma may offer a cheaper option than purchasing a T/C card.
__________________
http://www.patchn.com Industrial Electrical & Maintenance @ www.patchn.com "Tell me and I forget, show me and I remember, involve me and I understand." |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Lifetime Supporting Member + Moderator
|
You may want to contact these guys
http://www.statesvilleprocess.com/profile.htm I have all of my RTD's PT100, T/C's and other stuff made by them, they are up by Randy in NC, They may be able to come up with a 'well style' that may be robust enough for your applacation, their prices are good also.
__________________
www.PLCTrainer.net PLC Trainers, Communication Cables and Automation Supplies, Allen Bradley ~ Siemens ... YouTube PLC help videos.. http://www.ind-concepts.com/Support_and_Downloads.htm |
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Lifetime Supporting Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lucas, TX
Posts: 1,150
|
Dan's suggestion of 2 Conditioner Modules is probably the cheapest way out of this. Parallel the 0-10 volt outputs with two Schottky diodes (.2 volt drop). The highest voltage output will prevail. Compensate for the .2V drop with an offset in the PLC. Keep the diodes at a stable temp to avoid drift.
1) A full-wave bridge with zero voltage drop is done with 4 op-amps. This would get too complicated unless you can find a commercial unit. I don't know a source. 2) Detect a low temp. If low, latch in a polarity reversing relay or a shutdown alarm. 3) Read temp. Fire heater for a few seconds. Read temp again. It will be lower if T/C is reversed. Energize reversing relay or alarm. Last edited by keithkyll; July 29th, 2006 at 12:38 AM. |
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
__________________
Thunder is good, thunder is impressive; but it is lightning that does the work! Mark Twain-8/28/1908 |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Topics
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| It8 Thermocouple Problem | parag uike | LIVE PLC Questions And Answers | 5 | February 15th, 2006 03:06 AM |
| Thermocouple linearization in PLC software | TConnolly | LIVE PLC Questions And Answers | 4 | October 12th, 2005 02:06 AM |
| Thermocouple readout fluctuations | leitmotif | LIVE PLC Questions And Answers | 18 | March 5th, 2005 08:58 AM |
| Thermocouple uniformity | Matthias von Zorn | LIVE PLC Questions And Answers | 6 | September 25th, 2003 03:32 PM |
| Vacuum thermocouple integration to PLC | grignon | LIVE PLC Questions And Answers | 1 | April 26th, 2003 07:58 AM |