Yes, it would be. There are color-detector photosensors that can see small color changes, but with color-matched thread, it would be difficult to detect a missed stitch.Unlike some of the garment materials which have different shades and textures I am using fabric and thread that is all dyed to match each other. Having not used the vision systems I don't know if this will be a problem.
What would be easy to detect is a small metallic fiber embedded inside the thread. Then, it might be possible to use a proximity sensor to detect the presence/absence of a stitch. If you could get a thread manufacturer interested in this concept, it might be worth testing out. I would think there would be a huge demand world-wide (if it works).
Carrying it one step farther, with a metallic fiber in the center of the thread, and with machines that use two thread spools, you could even wire up a thread-break detector circuit between the two spools, using a low-voltage resistance detector that connects automatically when the spool is inserted onto a spindle with a commutator contact built in. The contacts wire back to the resistance detector, which measures the current loop formed from Spool 1 to the machine stitch (where the threads will be "shorted" by the stitching), back to Spool 2. Any missed stitch should cause a sudden increase in resistance in the circuit, and a thread break would cause an easily-detected open circuit.
(If you get a patent on the above thread-break detector, I am reserving 1% of the future profits for thinking up the idea!- Lancie1)
Last edited: