Yes, definetely.Should this be something that we need to take into concideration?
JesperMP said:That it says that the values cannot be monitored is because the PIW addresses hasnt been assigned to a "proces image" (= the IW addresses for the CPU). That is OK.
JesperMP said:Hey, but this COULD point to something !!!
The "bad" comments means that the block cannot be compiled, and if it is downloaded it will cause the aforementioned "Waiting for addresses error". This because the CPU interprets the "Comment" CALL as a real call to a block.
Maybe this is because the code is really from SCL or SFC, and STL cannot view it properly.
IW and QW addresses are scanned by the CPU before and after the call to OB1.What is the difference between the IW and PIW.
You may very well be right. A quick shot at it would be to "comment" the CALL and End Call (place "//" before them), save the blocks and download them.there are 2 errors per FC block, and 2 RTD's that are not working. This seems a little to coincidental to me. It seems like there is a relationship with the errors in the FC blocks and our RTD's not working. Give it some thought.