TimothyMoulder
Member
This is in response to Stephen Luft's comments elsewhere about all-in-one PLCs in general, and Unitronics in particular - I didn't want to hijack the thread
Stephen referred to a white-paper published by Entertron which made the following statements regarding such controllers:
>>All wiring terminates to the door of your enclosure, unlike the separate PLC and operator interface products that have two connections: one for the serial port and one for the power cable. There will be a huge wiring harness going to the door of your panel.<<
Now, this can happen. Personally, I don't like having a large cable running to my door, so I use expansion IO instead. A single 4-conductor data cable to my expansion adapter and away I go.
On the other hand, you don't strictly HAVE to mount your Vision 280 on a door. I find they work outstandingly well with a floor-mount pedestal.
>>The output rating will be less than the traditional PLCs and far less than Entertron's controllers due to board size and component ratings constraints.<<
Like my tax guy told me when I wanted to know if I could write my free-loading brother-in-law off as a dependent - "it depends". The E3B snap I/O has 3 Amps max for a resistive load, and 8 amps max per common. I believe this is on-par with most micro PLCs. And since I always use interposing relays (God Bless Phoenix Contact) it's pretty irrelevant to me anyway.
>>Possible replacement will be challenging in that you will have to remove the entire controller / operator interface<<
This is true with the smaller Uni lines, the M90/91 and Vision 120. The larger units use Snap IO, so if you fry one, just replace the module- it "snaps" on and off.
As for the smaller units, they all work with the same expansion IO, and as stated previously, I use that for the most part anyway.
>>One processor for both the operator interface and PLC greatly reduces the scan rate of your application.<<
Now there is some truth to this one. Unitronics PLCs have a slow scan rate owing to the need to update the HMI as well as scan the ladder. BUT! They are improving this all the time. The latest OS provides a 30% speed increase over the previous, and in any event, I've yet to encounter a job where the scan time was an issue anyhow.
In a nutshell, I like Unitronics for alot of other reasons besides the all-in-one thing. I like lots of options. I like free software. I like buying an entire PLC and HMI for half the price of some people's HMIs alone. I like free support. And I like ethernet connectivity for $110 US, instead of $500+. There's alot to love here besides the physical architecture of the system, which I can take or leave as needed.
Lastly, let me tell you, these suckers are durable. I've got two M90's I bought for $250 three years ago that are now in their third machine application, and still going strong without a hitch.
So, with all due respect to Mr Luft (nice guy, no complaints from me) I think I'll stick with my Uni! And that's my two bits.
TM
Stephen referred to a white-paper published by Entertron which made the following statements regarding such controllers:
>>All wiring terminates to the door of your enclosure, unlike the separate PLC and operator interface products that have two connections: one for the serial port and one for the power cable. There will be a huge wiring harness going to the door of your panel.<<
Now, this can happen. Personally, I don't like having a large cable running to my door, so I use expansion IO instead. A single 4-conductor data cable to my expansion adapter and away I go.
On the other hand, you don't strictly HAVE to mount your Vision 280 on a door. I find they work outstandingly well with a floor-mount pedestal.
>>The output rating will be less than the traditional PLCs and far less than Entertron's controllers due to board size and component ratings constraints.<<
Like my tax guy told me when I wanted to know if I could write my free-loading brother-in-law off as a dependent - "it depends". The E3B snap I/O has 3 Amps max for a resistive load, and 8 amps max per common. I believe this is on-par with most micro PLCs. And since I always use interposing relays (God Bless Phoenix Contact) it's pretty irrelevant to me anyway.
>>Possible replacement will be challenging in that you will have to remove the entire controller / operator interface<<
This is true with the smaller Uni lines, the M90/91 and Vision 120. The larger units use Snap IO, so if you fry one, just replace the module- it "snaps" on and off.
As for the smaller units, they all work with the same expansion IO, and as stated previously, I use that for the most part anyway.
>>One processor for both the operator interface and PLC greatly reduces the scan rate of your application.<<
Now there is some truth to this one. Unitronics PLCs have a slow scan rate owing to the need to update the HMI as well as scan the ladder. BUT! They are improving this all the time. The latest OS provides a 30% speed increase over the previous, and in any event, I've yet to encounter a job where the scan time was an issue anyhow.
In a nutshell, I like Unitronics for alot of other reasons besides the all-in-one thing. I like lots of options. I like free software. I like buying an entire PLC and HMI for half the price of some people's HMIs alone. I like free support. And I like ethernet connectivity for $110 US, instead of $500+. There's alot to love here besides the physical architecture of the system, which I can take or leave as needed.
Lastly, let me tell you, these suckers are durable. I've got two M90's I bought for $250 three years ago that are now in their third machine application, and still going strong without a hitch.
So, with all due respect to Mr Luft (nice guy, no complaints from me) I think I'll stick with my Uni! And that's my two bits.
TM