lumber sizing chain

roddbodd

Member
Join Date
Apr 2006
Location
alabama
Posts
15
i am working on a railroad tie sizing operation. there are two end saws, one of which is on a screw driven by a motor so you can move the saw for different length ties (6', 8', 10', ect.). i want to use a joy stick to move the saw in and out and some toggle switches (on/off) for the different lengths. i want to use one limit switch on the movable saw and install trips at each length. i was wanting some suggestions on the best way to do this. i was thinking about using a counter for each trip (count 1 6', count 2 8',ect.). if i do this i do i make it count backwards. i hope this make sense.if any more info is needed i will try to provide it.i don't get to do alot of programming so this is probably simple project and i just don't know what to do.thanks for the help. rodney
 
Do you have 3 or 4 fixed lengths to cut? If you’re using toggle switches to select the length then I would presume so. Considering this is a messy operation, and it might be a field saw used on site?? I would lean towards using limit switches set at each length that would be tripped by the saw carriage. This would have a short cam on the carriage and two limit switches at each stop.

The cam would activate both limits when the saw is in position. Double limit switches for each position would allow for a slowdown to limit inertia, and feedback direction. If you have 3 stops then you'll need 6 limits wired to 6 individual inputs. You can mount the limit switches on a stick of B-Line or Unit-Strut. The strut can act as a wiring trough and once the positions are set you can cut and snap a plastic cover (from the strut manufacture), over the open strut.

If your thinking about an encoder based positioning system, keep in mind that saw cuttings from RR ties are very gooey and messy. An IEC type limit switch would be far less susceptible to fouling.

BTW we have a limit switch bracket with a rear wire exit that allows you to attach a standard IEC limit to the strut. To adjust the limit you simply loosen two 5/16 bolts, (1/2 hex heads), and slide the switch on the struct. If you need some let me know. Sorry about the plug folks but I know of no other source for the brackets.

 
there are actually going to be 12 lengths. that is the reason for wanting to mount 1 limit switch on the carriage. these ties have not yet been treated so they are not to messy.thanks for replying, rodney
 
Roddbodd,

I dont think a single limit on the carrage would be very reliable. It's still suspectable to fouling, switch bounce, miss counts etc...

Is this a factory machine or a field tool? If it's a static shop unit to be used indoors, and since it's untreated material, I would tend to go with an encoder based positioning setup. The encoder would be placed static on one end of the track and be driven by a long open ended timing belt. The belt would be housed in an inverted struct and be driven by a small truck or slide mounted in the strut. The truck/slide would have an angle bracket that would attach it to the saw carriage. At each end of the strut/track mount an overtravel/homing limit to prevent overtravel and also be used to home or correct the encoder count. You can have as many stops as your heart desires, and they all can be adjusted by the operator via a small inexpensive HMI. Accuraccy could be to .001" depending on the encoder & belting you choose.
 
Is this going to be a machine indoors, which makes railroad ties to be shipped out to a job site? Or is this going to be a machine made to be at the job site, cutting them to required length as you lay them?

If it's a stationary machine, in a shop, then it'll be easy to have an encoder based system with an HMI, leaving yourself open for many possible length choice additions in the future. I don't believe mess will be a big problem, because you can easily guard and cover more "Delicate" parts (The encoder, the screw, any cords and wires used, the PLC).
 
:)

We have a few saws that use similar methods where I work. Of course, we didn't build ours, we bought them from saw companies (Granco, Elumatec, B&O Saws).

Personally I think it would be quite fun to build something like that from scratch. I always like machines I build/program being finished, working, doing exactly what they were supposed to do.
 
"I always like machines I build/program being finished, working, doing exactly what they were supposed to do."

That's my big thrill in life also. (well maybe 2nd or third biggest thrill)...
 
How about this?

If you're going to go with limit switches and you can stand it, mount four switches on the saw and fabricate enough cams (trips?), to be placed at each position, to generate a 4-bit binary code (excluding zero) at each saw position. This would give you fifteen possible codes and eliminate counting.

In the controller you'll need some sort of table to match switch codes to length positions.

.02
 
this machine is outside at a tie yard. we recieve the raw ties from sawmills and cut them to customer specifications and then treat them. as i said i don't do alot of plc programming so i don't know how to do the encoder setup nor am i sure about the 4-bit binary code. i guess i need something more simple if that is possible. i don't get to do enough of this to be very good. thanks for your replies. i might be in over my head on this one. i would appreciate any suggestions.
 
multi stop setup

I did a machine with a similar setup.
I used 1 prox switch and a gear that turned as the head moved.
Take the counts from the prox input and scale it to get your inch's/ per rev. then in the PLC you can set up any number of stop points. move in if the next set point is less than current Poisson. Move out if the new set point is larger.
It takes a little programing but works well.
No moving parts to get blocked by saw dust or weir out.
Racer
 
It's all compromise

Methods
  1. Digital Sensor - Field IO tells you where the SAW location
    • Sensor mounted on the Saw
      +ve's small IO count. Easy to add new lengths. By counting from an end of travel can know where you are until power off.
      -ve's Do not always know where the saw is. eg recovery from power off . Sensor wiring must travel with the saw (wire can break due to movement). Position is different if you move In vs Out by the width of the striker. IF Counting and a striker is not sensed will go to the wrong length.
    • Sensor mounted on frame, Striker mounted on Saw
      +ve's Know when you are at a preset length. Recovers well from power off if on a preset length. Can request Move to a particular length. No trailing wires mounted on the saw. One of the simplest methods to program.
      -ve's Do not always know where the saw is. eg recovery from power off between lengths. One sensor required per position. Position is different if you move In vs Out by the width of the striker.
  2. Position feedback
    • Position feedback Incremental
      typically an encoder mounted on screw (or motor if there is no possible slippage to the screw). A basic encoder is a gear wheel and a prox to sense each gear (ie a pulse counter) {like mracer}
      +ve's can dynamically change lengths. 1000's of different lengths. Can program slowdowns. Can get the Same position if moving In vs Out. Accuracy is much better (+/-1 count possible)
      -ve's Do not always know the saw location (e.g. recovery from power off) must reset the count by moving to a known position
    • Position feedback absolute
      Usually all the benefits of incremental devices plus knowing the saw is when power applied
      Some types are: Laser distance measurement, or Absolute encoders
      -ve's some need Analog inputs, Others require communications. Absolute encoders require High IO counts. Also after device replacement the device requires setting up (e.g. setting the correct absolute position at an endstop)
It all comes down to your application accuracy and operator functionality. Also if you are are comfortable with the installation and programming of the method.


PS don't forget the end of travel limits
 
Mracer, Similer to an encoder (programming wise).

Roddbodd,

Take the challange and bite on it. The encoder setup would be fairly simple and more reliable then the limits. However, being outside, instead of driving it with a timing belt, it might be best driven by a chain. You can house the encoder in a small NEMA 4 or 4X enclosure (maybe 14" x 14" x 6").

Based on what I know so far. The PLC I would reccomend would be an AD D0-06DR. The encoder would be an AD TRD-GK100-RZD.
(AD = AutomationDirect.com)

Again the drive chain would be housed in an inverted 4" or 6" x 1-5/8" strut (opening facing down). Either end sprocket can be used to drive the encoder.

As far as programming this setup it would be pretty streight forward & you'll get lots of help on this forum if your up front with the important details.
 

Similar Topics

Hello. I am trying to interpret some data from an FF-H1 installation in which some FF-H1 devices experience very irregular behaviour in that the...
Replies
0
Views
1,240
Hello, I have a question about fuses and how to calculate their required size. I understand that determining the appropriate fuse size isn't...
Replies
0
Views
141
Specification of Codesys is being driven by customer and I'm being asked to control roughly 100 network connected vfd's for a conveying project in...
Replies
12
Views
3,160
Good Morning , We have a 100 HP , 480 V (Full Load Amps 124 ) Hammer Mill motor that has a Wye/Delta starting procedure. I would like to put...
Replies
16
Views
4,242
I have 120 VAC feeding a Micrologix PLC. I am feeding my I/O with 24 VDC using a power supply. If I add up the current draw of all I/O, I get 5...
Replies
14
Views
4,646
Back
Top Bottom