DaveW said:I would like to know if there are any advantages to using 240VAC versus 480VAC. I know for motor controls 240V requires higher amperage and components must be rated higher but this doesn't mean we are wasting any more energy than 480V?
Chris S said:However this all comes to a screeching halt when you think about insulation needs and saftey of working on circuits.
BryanG said:OK, this is hearsay and I haven't checked the validity. I was taught that 110V tends to cause the heart to fail flaccid and easy-ish to restart. 415/480V causes the heart to fail contracted and easy-ish to restart. 240V leaves the heart fluttering and a lot harder to restart. Fluttering isn't the right word and makes me think of women and heaving bossoms but I am sure you get the drift. Now the only problem is how to get the heaving bossoms out of my mind so that I can get back to work. Bryan
Tharon said:240 will kill you just as easily as 480 will.
Chris S said:Ok yea your right its the Amps that kill you. I also have a pet pieve on that subject aswell.
But 480 has a tendency to hold you on a bit longer then 240
But I'm guessing you already knew that
leitmotif said:I dont know whether that holding stuff is a myth or not. After the ONE time I got it on 450 3 phase I have had absolutely no desire to be a test subject. I think that as voltage goes down it tends to hurt less but I have no desire to test that theory either.
Dan Bentler
Tharon said:I think it is a Myth. My first Circuits course, the professor told us that it was the frequency that did the holding. Apparently the 50Hz is "safer" than 60Hz (Both can still very much kill you, so stay away regardless).
Which is why many people might think that 230V is "safer" than 480V, since the European is predominantly 230V/50Hz and US is 480V/60Hz.
leitmotif said:So if it is the frequency that is doing the holding then DC must be perfectly safe?? From working on submarine battery I can vouch 250 VDC hurts also.