Hi,
customer woke me up today with strange problem.
He got machine controled by SLC 500 with DeviceNet network (some inverters and Remote IOs, 14 or something like that). After five minutes of work the error 78 (Slave device in scanlist table does not exist, solution from manual: Add the device to the network, or delete the scanlist entry
for that device) with random devices occurs. One time it's inverter, and other time it's Remote IO. They reset fault by powering down the whole cabinet.
When machine isn't working everything is ok, situation only occurs when it's working.
They checked all connections, voltage level etc.(they don't have expierence with it but checked everything against Rockwell instalation instructions) Those seems ok. They instaled seperate DC power for the network. There where no changes in network recently ?
Any idea ? I think that there might be something wrong with the sccaner, but I don't have any expierence with CeviceNet on SLC 500. (I work with it only on CLX and CompactLogix).
Best regards,
Matt
customer woke me up today with strange problem.
He got machine controled by SLC 500 with DeviceNet network (some inverters and Remote IOs, 14 or something like that). After five minutes of work the error 78 (Slave device in scanlist table does not exist, solution from manual: Add the device to the network, or delete the scanlist entry
for that device) with random devices occurs. One time it's inverter, and other time it's Remote IO. They reset fault by powering down the whole cabinet.
When machine isn't working everything is ok, situation only occurs when it's working.
They checked all connections, voltage level etc.(they don't have expierence with it but checked everything against Rockwell instalation instructions) Those seems ok. They instaled seperate DC power for the network. There where no changes in network recently ?
Any idea ? I think that there might be something wrong with the sccaner, but I don't have any expierence with CeviceNet on SLC 500. (I work with it only on CLX and CompactLogix).
Best regards,
Matt