I did a search on this topic, but I couldn't help myselfsurferb said:I expected this thread to open up a can of worms. Surprisingly, conversation has been on topic about technical details and possible alternatives. There are many similar posts that also provide good information, just do a search. This is one of those threads that has been discussed time and time again. The last one I remember digressed from useful information and got into a branding flame war.
& I'm glad I posted the question because I got some good info out it.
As for opening a can of worms, I wasn't really thinking about that. The LAST thing I want to do is start an arguement, as
of now, I could see where this topic could turn south.
I guess that I should have thought about it more.
I'm glad to see that it hasn't turned into something it wasn't
intended to be.
I looked into some of manuals about stage programming,CharlesM said:Take the time to learn stage programming. If your doing a sequence type program it is very nice.
I haven't seen it before but it doesn't look too bad, just different. If my boss gives me the go ahead I'll
have to try it. I like to keep my programs as simple as I
can & somewhat organized, if that's even possible in my case.
(I can't even keep my wallet organized.)