Ok, I've setup comms to PLC's that are behind a NAT switch before, but I have not had a PLC behind one NAT switch communicate with a second PLC behind a separate NAT switch.
Here is what I have:
PLC_A EN2T - 192.168.10.4
NAT_Switch_A LAN - 192.168.10.6 / WAN 10.50.10.100
PLC_B EN2T - 192.168.11.4
NAT_Switch_B LAN - 192.168.11.6 / WAN 10.50.10.200
PLC_A has an EN2T card in the second slot with an IP address of 192.168.10.4. This card is connected to the LAN port of NAT_switch_A. The WAN port of NAT_switch_A is connected to the WAN port of NAT_switch_B. The PLC_B has a EN2T card in the second slot with an IP address of 192.168.11.4 and is connected to the LAN port of NAT_switch_B.
Is is possible to have produced/consumed tags between the two PLC's here with this setup?
I get I need to set up masquerading to allow PLC_A to send packets from its 192.168.10.4 network to the WAN 10.50.10.4 network, but what would I do at NAT_siwtch_B to allow the connected to come through and go to PLC_B?
Thanks.
Here is what I have:
PLC_A EN2T - 192.168.10.4
NAT_Switch_A LAN - 192.168.10.6 / WAN 10.50.10.100
PLC_B EN2T - 192.168.11.4
NAT_Switch_B LAN - 192.168.11.6 / WAN 10.50.10.200
PLC_A has an EN2T card in the second slot with an IP address of 192.168.10.4. This card is connected to the LAN port of NAT_switch_A. The WAN port of NAT_switch_A is connected to the WAN port of NAT_switch_B. The PLC_B has a EN2T card in the second slot with an IP address of 192.168.11.4 and is connected to the LAN port of NAT_switch_B.
Is is possible to have produced/consumed tags between the two PLC's here with this setup?
I get I need to set up masquerading to allow PLC_A to send packets from its 192.168.10.4 network to the WAN 10.50.10.4 network, but what would I do at NAT_siwtch_B to allow the connected to come through and go to PLC_B?
Thanks.
Last edited: