FTView SE Distributed App with isolated HMI Tags

jkerekes

Member
Join Date
Aug 2007
Location
NJ
Posts
2,363
I have a customer with an SE distributed application. It's version 7 running on a Windows 7 32 bit server and three VersaView Clients running XP. The issue is how on SE distributed can we get each client access to HMI tags that the other clients can't write to. The original application what designed for SE Station.

We need a folder of HMI tags that is unique to each client. Looked at different tech notes and passing parameters and such. Doesn't seem like its going to work.

Each client is gong to be setup that on the overview page an operator can choose which part of the process that he can control. Each client needs to act independently of each other. Sort of like SE Station. Any ideas? Thanks.
 
I have a customer with an SE distributed application. It's version 7 running on a Windows 7 32 bit server and three VersaView Clients running XP. The issue is how on SE distributed can we get each client access to HMI tags that the other clients can't write to. The original application what designed for SE Station.

We need a folder of HMI tags that is unique to each client. Looked at different tech notes and passing parameters and such. Doesn't seem like its going to work.

Each client is gong to be setup that on the overview page an operator can choose which part of the process that he can control. Each client needs to act independently of each other. Sort of like SE Station. Any ideas? Thanks.

I have been complaining to Rockwell for many years about the lack of client side tags.

There is a way around it with setting up a tag folder for each client and loading specific parameter files on client start up but it's a PIA.
 
You simply cannot do that with SE.

Any client can write to any tag, period.

The best you could do would be to use some local, VBA Scripted client-side code to decide which specific computer it is running on, and then only enable displays/code for that computer. You can do that by getting the computer name in VBA and hardcoding it, or using the "FileExist" function in VBA and/or the FileExist FTView system function in individual fields and expressions.

At this point, Rockwell should just go ahead and pull FTView from the market, and start paying anyone that actually has it damages on a yearly basis based on how many licenses they have for it.
 

Similar Topics

Hello all, I am trying to publish a Network Distributed Application in FTView 9.0. My steps are the following: 1. Create the Network Distributed...
Replies
1
Views
3,488
Hoping for some help on this one, we are running FTVIEW SE distributed on a server. The client file runs fine on this server. We have...
Replies
4
Views
3,760
Working on a customer's FTView SE Distributed (v11) environment, and I am using one of the workstations for development. I have been getting a...
Replies
0
Views
1,438
Hello Experts, I have a system with network distributed redundant server with 5 clients and an engineering laptop. Can any one please describe...
Replies
1
Views
2,077
Hello. I am trying to save a FTView SE 9 Distributed Network project as a local copy. We do not have a redundant server and we are taking our...
Replies
4
Views
2,592
Back
Top Bottom