BST XIC S587[0].1 NXB XIC Line[1].12 BST XIC S587Mcu2A[0].0 NXB XIC S586Mcu2A[0].0 NXB XIC S586Op1A[0].0 NXB XIC S587Op1A[0].0 BND BND XIC S587Mcu2AEn[0].0 XIO S586FltDet[0].0 XIO S587FltDet[0].0 OTE S587[0].10
In Logix Designer, when you double-click on a rung number, a Boolean display box opens above the rung, which shows the logic as Boolean code. THIS is the order in which the instructions in that particular rung are scanned and executed.
The above is just an example of that Boolean code including several branching instructions. The display is selected as ASCII Text, not Neutral Text.
The branches are parallel but the execution is sequential, one Boolean instruction at a a time. I'm not trying to muddy the waters, nor be argumentative. It's just that "left-to-right, top to bottom, period," does not fully describe the scan process, at least in my opinion .
In Logix Designer, when you double-click on a rung number, a Boolean display box opens above the rung, which shows the logic as Boolean code. THIS is the order in which the instructions in that particular rung are scanned and executed.
The above is just an example of that Boolean code including several branching instructions. The display is selected as ASCII Text, not Neutral Text.
The branches are parallel but the execution is sequential, one Boolean instruction at a a time. I'm not trying to muddy the waters, nor be argumentative. It's just that "left-to-right, top to bottom, period," does not fully describe the scan process, at least in my opinion .