kamenges
Member
Originally posted by geniusintraining:
You need to give them time, ...
Agreed. You wouldn't expect to see many recovered right now since the expected recovery time is about the same as the time since our first recorded infection. Serious or not, the metric for recovery will be fairly strict; intended to prevent further infections.
Originally posted by Peter Nachtwey:
China has reported a lot of recovered. I don't believe it.
So who are you going to believe? We have to use a country that has a fairly stable, small-ish infection rate. Kind of a small sample group. You good with South Korea? Their infection rate has largely flat-lined. Their current mortality rate using only the recovered or dead is about 5%. Only 1% of their current cases are critical. This is the group you would expect future deaths to come out of. They have four times more active cases than closed cases. You would expect their mortality will drop pretty significantly as time goes on.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/south-korea/
As you said, Peter, on the worldwide level we are on the front edge of the mortality rate calculation. Those with a weakened immune system will tend to die before the survivors will be declared recovered. That tends to skew the percentages in the early portion of reporting. Again, look at the South Korean graphs of percentage of recovered to percentage dead. For a while they were hovering around 50/50, just like the US is. Not so much anymore.
Keith