Sequential Start --- Please Help

elitheei

Member
Join Date
Nov 2004
Location
Atlanta
Posts
81
I got to do a project that requires a sequential start of 5 motors with a time delay between each one ... 1 to 5 then a stop 5 to 1 with a time delay between each. Can you guys help. I am so green I look like the spring grass, I am using a AB SLC-500. A pdf file would be great. Thanks in advance for your help. I also got to allow for e-stops .. :(
 
Start the first motor and a timer at the same time. When the timer times out, start the second one and another timer. When the second one times out, start the third motor and another timer. IMHO, I'd say make your e-stops hardwired, not logical in the PLC.
 
And check the safety rules for E-stops for your location.
Where I live all E-stops have to be double interlocked with cross monitoring. Better to use a Pilz type safety relay for this and not an ordinary PLC.

I believe AB have some good quality safety relays as well, with some capable of being plugged directly into the PLC rack as a standard card.
 
If this is truly a project for industry, and not a student exercise, then there's lots more things to consider than just the order of startup.

Typically in a conveyor system, the LAST conveyor is started FIRST (otherwise, you'll be feeding product onto a non-moving conveyor, causing jams, etc).

You usually take the Aux contact from the motor starter as an input to the PLC, to confirm that the motor is running. This signal is used to both drive the startup timer, AND to shut down IMMEDIATEDLY any upstream conveyors.

You will often have two types of stop methods in your system: a "controlled shutdown" AND an "immedieate stop". The immediate stop would be for E-stops and motor faults. The controlled shutdown is where you have your cascaded timers (shutting down the FIRST conveyor FIRST, after a delay to give it enough time to get all the product onto the second conveyor, THEN starting the second conveyor shutdown timer (which again allows that last box to move onto the third conveyor, etc.)



ChuckM said:
IMHO, I'd say make your e-stops hardwired, not logical in the PLC.

While I agree with you that the e-stops should be hard wired, it doesn't hurt to ALSO let the PLC know that the E-Stop has been pressed, and for the PLC to shut the system down in parallel. Otherwise, the PLC will be trying to drive the output, it won't see the Aux contact, and assume that the motor FAILED. Or, worse, the PLC will not stop driving the outputs, and so ALL conveyors will be restarted as soon as the E-stop RESET button is pressed. This is probably undesireable.
 

Similar Topics

Hi there, We have a system at a water treatment plant where large raw water tanks feed into the plant that's all on the same level. At high tank...
Replies
18
Views
3,805
Hi, I started off my career in PLC programming doing water/wastewater on AB around 20 years ago, but then moved overseas a few years later and...
Replies
57
Views
12,184
It appears to me that Logix is improperly executing sheets of an AOI in sequential scans instead of the same scan as the main program. To test...
Replies
4
Views
1,690
Hi, is it possible to read the name of the steps in an S7 Graph sequencer? In the parameterinterface there is, for example the parameter #S_NO...
Replies
21
Views
7,238
Hi All, is there a way to incorporate SFC with HMI in some way, in order to represent missing conditions for next step. Something similiar...
Replies
0
Views
982
Back
Top Bottom