Advantages of profibus over MPI ?

ragav_rp

Member
Join Date
Apr 2005
Posts
4
Hi, i want to know the disadvantages of communicating through through MPI port of SIEMENS PLC to RS-232 port of PC over, using PROFIBUS.I want to know details regarding the performance of these two.I will be waiting for your kindly responses.thank you.
 
Hello ragav_rp;

Let's presume you are speaking about programming and/or monitoring data from the PLC.

Here are a few points to consider:
- speed: MPI works between 19,2/38.4 kB, with a PC adapter on COMx port of the PC, to 187,5 kB on a dedicated CP card in the PC (e.g. CP5611, Cp5511, CP5613). The MPi port can be setup at 12 MB (as a DP port, though). Profibus can be used at 12 MB (with the same PC cards) although generally they work at 1,5 MB.

-distance; MPI is limited to 50 m (segment length); you can use repeaters to extend it, as shown in the following interresting illustration:

MPI_repeaters.jpg


Profibus allows a segment length of 100m at 12 MB, 500m at 187,5 kB; segments may be added with repeaters.

Although not interresting for programming purposes, this information is also a good distnction between the 2 buses:
-number of participants: for MPI, up to 31 stations total on all segments. For Profibus, you can have 31 stations per segnment, with a total of 126 stations on the bus.


Hope this helps,
Daniel Chartier
 
I'm not sure if this is correct but I've always been told that there are issues in connecting two or more PLC's via Profibus and that the comms can be slightly unstable. However connecting two or more PLC's via MPI is fine.

Again, this is just what I was told by a rep at Siemens who said that if you just wanted to run 'slaves' from a PLC such as Inverters etc then Profi is fine but if you wanted multiple PLCs connecting then MPI was better.

So a typical config would be PLC's from many machines connected via MPI and then each individual PLC would have its own nodes (such as inverters etc) connected via Profibus.

Someone with more knowledge on this though will probably be able to confirm whether I'm just speaking out of my hat...

;-)
 
Hello, Johnny T.

I've done a couple of multimaster installations over Profibus-DP, and never had stability problems, although you do have to evaluate the amount of data you need to transport over the bus. What has given me problems was when I overlooked the connection limits of the older S7-300 CPUs and tried to put too many HMI stations on a single bus along with the slaves. This is easier to overcome now, as the newer CPUs support more connections over DP.
Hope this helps,
Daniel Chartier
 
Daniel

Thanks for that. I was never 100% sure on the differences myself between MPI and Profi.

Personally I find MPI easier to set up.

Thanks for the info.

Cheers

JT
 

Similar Topics

I want to make a network of Mitsubishi FX2N of 12 units. I found that I can do it in RS485, CCLink or Profibus. But FX2N can communicate maximum...
Replies
0
Views
2,864
Hello world. This is my first post here. My question: Should I upgrade from DirectSOFT05 (5.3) to the current version? My project is to build a...
Replies
3
Views
1,957
So Ladder is easy to read graphically, most everything can be coded in ladder, and it represents wiring diagrams the closest. SCL and ST are good...
Replies
5
Views
1,778
I need Pros and Cons of WinCC(TIA), WinCC flexible and Intouch,which will be using with Siemens S7 1200 Controller.. It will be used for...
Replies
0
Views
2,324
hey guys, the company I work for has decided they want to update our PLC5 machines to Controllogix with ethernet communication so they can monitor...
Replies
7
Views
2,612
Back
Top Bottom