how to calculate reliabilty of a plc system

johnny6113

Member
Join Date
Mar 2006
Location
Kuala Lumpur
Posts
5
Can someone please help me on how to calculate the reliability of a plc system without using the MTTF and MTBF equation?What I mean. is there any other equation that I can use.thanks.
 
Last edited:
I'm going to expand on the previous post a little bit.....


We have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.



Although a quick google search tells me that it's most likely the "mean time to failure" and "mean time between failure" equations, whatever the heck those are. :)
 
Some mfg's will give you the MTBF for components, some won't. Beyond the hardware, the programming could be tested with an extensive FMEA (Failure Mode & Effect Analysis) but ultimately one year in continuous service would prove it out.
 
I am sorry for lack of information.Actually I need to find the reliability of a system consist of 4 PLC unit by having four-monthly test.

MTTF means "mean time to failure"
MTBF means "mean time between failure"


Both are use to find the failure rate.
 
Last edited:
Hi Johnny

The reliability of a system (however you define that system) is the probability of a failure occuring within a defined period of time.
What I mean. is there any other equation that I can use
I'm sorry but the definition of reliability means you have to use the equation that calculates it from MTBF and time. There may be different ways of expressing the equation but at the end of the day it's always going to be the same equation. Why do you want/need to use another equation?

-(time/MTBF)
Reliability = e


Everything fails eventually, so given a long enough 'time' everything's reliability is zero. Equally, if you reduce the 'time' to a small enough period you can achieve a seemingly impossible 100% reliability for anything. It's up to the user to use an appropriate period relevant to their needs e.g. 1 month, 1 year etc.

Regards

Ken
 
Ken, are you sure about that formula. When time=MTBF then the reliability is .37. Where does the mean come in?

We calculate a MTBF for our products. The rating is bogus because adding parts makes the system more unreliable. However, some of these parts are necessary to make the inputs more robust.
 
Ken M said:
Hi Johnny

The reliability of a system (however you define that system) is the probability of a failure occuring within a defined period of time.I'm sorry but the definition of reliability means you have to use the equation that calculates it from MTBF and time. There may be different ways of expressing the equation but at the end of the day it's always going to be the same equation. Why do you want/need to use another equation?

-(time/MTBF)
Reliability = e


Everything fails eventually, so given a long enough 'time' everything's reliability is zero. Equally, if you reduce the 'time' to a small enough period you can achieve a seemingly impossible 100% reliability for anything. It's up to the user to use an appropriate period relevant to their needs e.g. 1 month, 1 year etc.

Regards

Ken


thanks for the explanation.Is there any equation which involve the reliability and the maintainance interval such as the affect on reliability by having a maintenance at 6 monthly interval and 4 monthly interval.
 

Similar Topics

Hi everyone, This is my first time posting, so please forgive any omissions or mistakes. I am attempting to control the velocity of a stepper...
Replies
18
Views
1,153
Good morning, I have a question. I don't know much about ST yet I would like to calculate the average number of products per hour. how do I do...
Replies
22
Views
3,012
Can someone help me with this? I'm no good at SCL - virtually everything I've done so far has been ladder logic. The return value from the...
Replies
13
Views
1,135
I want to calculate the energy consumed from instantaneous power. Can this be done using the TOT block with timebase set to Hour?
Replies
2
Views
714
Hi everyone, I have to calculate the length in millimeters of a glass that enters a transport (I don't know the speed yet) through a barrier...
Replies
15
Views
3,502
Back
Top Bottom