TConnolly
Lifetime Supporting Member
A while back I started a thread to discuss FasTrack's PLC Workshop for Modicon -vs- Proworx32.
http://www.plctalk.net/qanda/showthread.php?t=24524
We were using Proworx NXT and needed a second licnese. I was hesitant to use Proworx32 because I've heard too many bug rumors.
We ultimately ended up purchasing a license of the FasTrack software. Since then, I have not been too highly impressed with the FasTrack software. We have it on two machines and we share the dongle as needed. On both machines it has a nasty blue screen habit - and tech support ultimately wasn't much help in resolving it, though they tired and finally said "reinstall it," which didn't work. Then at the one year mark we discovered the built in extortion ware; if you don't buy a new annual support contract and enter a new code for the dongle you get a pestering pop up to do so everytime you want to use it.
We continued to use ProworxNXT for Bubba's maintenance laptop. But Bubba needs a new laptop now so I'm revisiting the issue. Proworx32 v2.0 was also reported to be a little buggy, but how is V 2.1?
http://www.plctalk.net/qanda/showthread.php?t=24524
We were using Proworx NXT and needed a second licnese. I was hesitant to use Proworx32 because I've heard too many bug rumors.
We ultimately ended up purchasing a license of the FasTrack software. Since then, I have not been too highly impressed with the FasTrack software. We have it on two machines and we share the dongle as needed. On both machines it has a nasty blue screen habit - and tech support ultimately wasn't much help in resolving it, though they tired and finally said "reinstall it," which didn't work. Then at the one year mark we discovered the built in extortion ware; if you don't buy a new annual support contract and enter a new code for the dongle you get a pestering pop up to do so everytime you want to use it.
We continued to use ProworxNXT for Bubba's maintenance laptop. But Bubba needs a new laptop now so I'm revisiting the issue. Proworx32 v2.0 was also reported to be a little buggy, but how is V 2.1?