jraef
Member
Agree with the sentiment above, but if there's any risk of harm involved, selecting a PB over a switch is not even close to an acceptable risk mitigation strategy. As far as a control measure goes, that's so far down the list it's not even worth a mention. The start/stop control should only ever be for control, safety should be taken care of by a risk assessment and proper procedure - eliminate, substitute, engineer, administrative, PPE. An e/stop comes after ALL of that, and then your start/stop controls even later.
No argument really, that is sound advice. BUT, there IS a reason why extended head and mushroom head buttons exist, pre-dating all of the other more specific safety strategies, going back to the KISS* concept. In fact the nexus concept actually goes back to when, in the dawn of automation when I started out with the original "PLC" from Allen Bradley in the 1970s, we began using 2 wire control vs 3 wire control. There were arguments made as to the entire concept of a selector switch being the only local Stop method as being inherently unsafe from the standpoint of what people will look to do in an emergency situation. You can design in all the safety logic and preventative measure you need, but sometimes it comes down to basic human responses to unforeseen circumstances. That's when KISS pays off, because our "lizard brain", the amygdala, is what makes us take emergency action, and it is in essence an interrupt function, bypassing all higher logic as much as possible so as to not sacrifice speed. I can probably train a lizard to slap his tail on a button to take action to get a reward, but I can't train it to rotate a switch, let alone in the correct direction.
* For those who don't know, KISS means Keep It Simple, Stupid or Stupidly Simple, depending on where you heard it first.