Curious Survey

Clay B.

Lifetime Supporting Member
Join Date
Jun 2005
Location
Concord,NC
Posts
1,304
After reading the Post on "Help With One Shots" http://www.plctalk.net/qanda/showthread.php?t=24967 It got me thinking. Most of my career I have been given vague instructions on what was needed. Thru luck (good or bad) most of the jobs I have worked on delt with existing equipment that needed to upgraded or retrofitted for a new job. To myself the instructions have been vague due to the person who gave them being ignorant of what is actually required for the job.Generally I try and get to know who is giving the instructions and guage where their skill set is at and what they are likely to miss or overlooked so I can make sure those items are covered on my end.

My question is this, how many of the professionals in here have had similar experences and how did you handle it.
 
I still build most of my control systems but if I am specifying a machine, system or something like it I don't nail down every specific point. I specify what we are starting with and what we want the end product to be.

If I was to nail down every detail I would, and actually I do, go ahead order the parts and build the thing myself.

The vagueness can be a good thing. I know what I want and I know what raw material we are going to feed the thing. Much can be developed in that gray area of how we do it.

Also customers may leave that gray area for you to fill in to see your capablities. To give an example though I did not do it intentionally, we will use a linear transducer I am trying to get right now. I want it to be built into a cylinder if possible. The only reason for that is additional protection. But anyway my only specifications on this were that it have a 6.5 inch stroke, the way it is to be mounted, and that it have a SSI interface. I could care less about anything of the other specs such as bore, port size, etc.

After some thinking and a PM from a gentleman on this forum about it, I realized that the fact that the vendor I was working work on this couldn't manage to fill in the blanks was a sure sign that I need to find another vendor
 
I recently did a small project for a company that has been building a standard machine for years using relays. They wanted to change to PLC control. When I got there they had an operators panel full of switches. They also selected a panelview 1000 to control 2 timers in a Micro 1200 because the sales guy told him they would need a bright panel for use in a dark place. Every time someone would describe the sequence they would use different names for what I found out later to be the same thing. I wrote a partial program expecting to jog the machine around and see for myself what it did.
One day I showed up and they had hired a student to reprogram the machine because (my program was not any good).
I often run across this but this was the worst one.
 

Similar Topics

I have a client who periodically experiences network communication issues. Sometimes when I VPN into the site, their SCADA systems will flash comm...
Replies
2
Views
193
I'm focusing on Rockwell programming for a couple of projects, and I've been thinking about some of the details I've come across while working...
Replies
13
Views
2,351
Hello all. I was starting to get into a new project (that will probably never see the light of day because $$$) at the plant I work in and...
Replies
26
Views
5,600
Just curious, Have you noticed how the Honeywell C200 and the A-B Controllogix look alike? Are this two related somehow? Are they compatible...
Replies
3
Views
2,044
Studio v31 FTV v10.01 Found the logic was acting backwards. so I switch the name plates on the three way "Control Mode" Right is the FactoryTalk...
Replies
3
Views
1,533
Back
Top Bottom