Recommended HW for robust Linux+IO

JorgeusMax

Member
Join Date
Jul 2022
Location
Denmark
Posts
6
Hello all,

I have a client that needs to externally control some valves at a small plant, nothing fancy. (for which I just need digital IO).

What I need is a robust alternative to a raspberry pi, that can run a linux OS and also have some IO available.

Can rou recommend any device that is more robust than a raspberry? I also have to install 4G comms so in order to avoid buying a 4G router it would be amazing if the device integrated 4G comms. So it would be something like:

IO + linux (on intel desirably) + 4G.

Are there any options that you are aware of?

PD: Linux on intel preferably to ARM.

Thanks!
 
Thanks guys! it looks promising, the problem is that there is no stock! the compact version looks as what I need but I don't find it available anywhere. (there is actually one place selling it for ver 500 euro which is nuts).
 
I think that it will be difficult to find a device with integrated I/O that fits your other requirements.
I/O comes in endless variations. Because of that it makes a lot of sense to separate CPU and I/O.
Even of you would find the unicorn device that has everything, in the long run it will be a straightjacket that limits you to that specific device and specific I/O.
 
Thanks! These devices are way too pricy for the task in hand.
I am starting to rethink the architecture. My client basically needs to remotely control some valves with their phone.
1) In order to avoid creating an app + API I think a simple web page is the way.
2) The web page should be hosted by the client so that is why I thought of an embedded linux. Is there any recommended low cost PLC based solution that provides web server?

PD: I guess I could also host the web page my self in the cloud and let the client's DDNS router point to it. Then I would just need to install a basic plc.
 
So, the actual real requirements are:
1. Accessible remotely via 4G.
2. Must be able to control a few I/O.
3. Must be low cost.

I think that what you need is an RTU. But these are actually more expensive than PLCs.
 

So, the actual real requirements are:
1. Accessible remotely via 4G.
2. Must be able to control a few I/O.
3. Must be low cost.

I think that what you need is an RTU. But these are actually more expensive than PLCs.

Exactly,

I have worked with S7-1200 and afik the web server is quite limited to be honest.

I am being tempted to just install a Raspberry pi 4. The problem is that in my experience, at least with older versions, is that they have to be rebooted from time to time.
 

Similar Topics

Out of interest, I'd like some thoughts on what would be considered best practice with regards to a 2-position turntable control scheme (see...
Replies
17
Views
1,151
We are going to be using a SIRUS 3RW5545 Soft Start to control a 480V, 150HP fan. Looking for some recommendations for parameters to use with this...
Replies
0
Views
852
Good Afternoon , I'm getting ready to lease a lot of Rockwell Software. I really don't have any desire to go the VM route , just because I'm...
Replies
2
Views
2,020
I wanted to get some opinions and maybe a point in the right direction for products on networking machines for data collection. Im not all that...
Replies
15
Views
4,850
Hi, Dose anyone have recommendations for Ethernet cable for site-use with laptop? I usually use regular office cable, but the lock-pin usually...
Replies
11
Views
3,897
Back
Top Bottom