SimonGoldsworthy
Member
PeterW said:I've seen scans increase where I/O was missing.
I have seen this too. I normally use a 317 and running the program in the CPU without the remote i/o connected does not significantly change the scan time. On the occasions where I have used a 315 it is a different story as the scan time increases dramatically when the error OB's are processed. Note that from the diagnostic buffer entries posted by STL there is no mention of any rack failures or I/O access failures so it appears the I/O is OK.
I use the error OB's so the CPU doesn't stop but I always flag up the various OB faults via the HMI.