drbitboy
Lifetime Supporting Member
I meant that, because Rung 5 (transition #4 to #1) was followed by Rung 6 (transition #1 to #5), you were expecting that the system would transition in sequence from #4 to #1 to #5 at some point.A bit truth is there too I must admit that. What you mean by saying Rung 6 is immediately after Rung 5, and they had mental model of Rung6? Are you refering to thing i did not follow logic part or system, that i just did follow rung one after other by my sequence numbers?
X cycle is not repeated in cycles 2-6 after cycle 5 is reached.
But cycles 1/2/3/4 are executed twice before getting to cycle 5, is that correct?