Peter Nachtwey
Member
I meant to say most papers comparing fuzzy logic vs PID are frauds.
Fuzzy logic can work but not better than PID with feed forwards.
I know some will take issue with this statement but I can prove that many papers comparing fuzzy logic to PID are not valid and have no basis in control theory.
Most of these fuzzy logic vs PID papers make the PID response look intentionally poor relative to the fuzzy logic response. The authors of these papers are either frauds or simply ignorant of how to properly use a PID. If I were their professor I would have failed the students. I would also question the credentials of those that though the paper was good enough to publish. What is really said is that engineering organizations publish these papers even though know one knows how to properly evaluate whether the document is valid.
You have been warned.
Fuzzy logic can work but not better than PID with feed forwards.
I know some will take issue with this statement but I can prove that many papers comparing fuzzy logic to PID are not valid and have no basis in control theory.
Most of these fuzzy logic vs PID papers make the PID response look intentionally poor relative to the fuzzy logic response. The authors of these papers are either frauds or simply ignorant of how to properly use a PID. If I were their professor I would have failed the students. I would also question the credentials of those that though the paper was good enough to publish. What is really said is that engineering organizations publish these papers even though know one knows how to properly evaluate whether the document is valid.
You have been warned.
Last edited: