Duranthas
Lifetime Supporting Member
And where did I talk about mass overdoses? I didn't now, did I? So who was doing the assertions there?
Now maybe go back and think again what did I say, then maybe you get why I got the impression you were ****ed with your answer.
If we want to play semantics, I could point out that Rednecks is plural. Plural can constitute a mass mount.
The entire story about overdoses of Ivermectin was about all the calls to Poison Control, and hospitals in Oklahoma being overloaded to the point that gun shot victims (why only them?) had to wait for care. That would constitute a mass amount of people by any reasonable person. To be fair, you never said it was a mass overdose, but you aren't going to get me to believe that your stance on this isn't based largely off the now debunked story.
I was simply pointing out that the story itself is a lie, perpetuating it is disingenuous, and belittling those that you disagree with is a pretty poor way of handling things. I'm not the one broad brushing large chunks of the US populace, nor am I the one calling people stupid.
There is an abundance of good scientific data to use showing effective measures against Covid. Can we at least agree that pointing people to these things would be a more effective approach to a mature and healthy dialogue than name calling and jabs?