lostcontrol
Lifetime Supporting Member
Hi,
We have a site with a SLC503 connected to the Ethernet network via a 1761-NET-ENI.
Currently, there are 2x incoming connections registered.
1 is for a local Touchscreen, with the other being the Site SCADA.
I have had a request to modify a process on the site that is currently controlled by a L32E. There are items that are controlled by the SLC that are required to be also controlled via the L32E under certain circumstance.
My thoughts are to message from the L32E to the SLC a single control word (as that is all that is required).
Should I be concerned about this, with this type of module?
There is plans to upgrade the SLC in the near future to a ML, but that has been on hold for a while due to other projects.
I would think that since the unit has 6 x incoming & 2x outgoing connections, increasing the connections to 3 should not be a problem..?
We have a site with a SLC503 connected to the Ethernet network via a 1761-NET-ENI.
Currently, there are 2x incoming connections registered.
1 is for a local Touchscreen, with the other being the Site SCADA.
I have had a request to modify a process on the site that is currently controlled by a L32E. There are items that are controlled by the SLC that are required to be also controlled via the L32E under certain circumstance.
My thoughts are to message from the L32E to the SLC a single control word (as that is all that is required).
Should I be concerned about this, with this type of module?
There is plans to upgrade the SLC in the near future to a ML, but that has been on hold for a while due to other projects.
I would think that since the unit has 6 x incoming & 2x outgoing connections, increasing the connections to 3 should not be a problem..?